From: Patrick Williams <patrick@stwcx.xyz>
To: Vishwanatha Subbanna <vishwa@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Brad Bishop <bradleyb@fuzziesquirrel.com>,
"openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org" <openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: Request for Feedback :: Time Mode setting in timemanager
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 10:33:26 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200220163326.GC41328@patrickw3-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B09077F7-2752-4C7C-B005-38B00C6DD428@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1332 bytes --]
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 12:07:06PM +0530, Vishwanatha Subbanna wrote:
> Thanks for the good discussion on this.
>
> Patrick, I see you mentioned the TimeOwner in your response. TimeOwner was
> another thing that was disliked by the users and I had sent an email couple
> months ago asking if anyone still needs it. I did not see anyone saying they
> need. I then proposed removing TimeOwner feature.
>
> So, if we want to make it simpler, we would want to:
>
> - Remove TimeOwner concept
> - Remove the deferred updates to Manual / NTP settings.
>
> Please let me know if you see anything that might be affected by this ?.
I tried to provide history as best as I recollect, mostly to be helpful.
As I've mentioned elsewhere in this thread, Facebook servers use a
Host-owned RTC. Unless someone can speak to non-Power servers that have
a BMC-owned RTC, this might only affect IBM(*). You'll need to decide what
impact removing this feature may have to you and your customers.
If you'd like to put together a proposal and seek feedback on what the
potential side effects for specific customer classes might be, I can
certainly do that, but right now I don't really have enough information
on what the "new" design would be just from those two bullets.
(*) - And OpenPower.
--
Patrick Williams
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-20 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-18 12:56 Request for Feedback :: Time Mode setting in timemanager Vishwanatha Subbanna
2020-02-18 14:40 ` Brad Bishop
2020-02-18 16:46 ` Ryan Arnell
2020-02-18 20:25 ` Patrick Williams
2020-02-18 20:34 ` Brad Bishop
2020-02-18 20:52 ` Patrick Williams
2020-02-18 21:01 ` Brad Bishop
2020-02-18 21:48 ` Patrick Williams
2020-02-18 21:01 ` Brad Bishop
2020-02-18 21:51 ` Patrick Williams
2020-02-19 6:37 ` Vishwanatha Subbanna
2020-02-20 16:33 ` Patrick Williams [this message]
2020-02-24 6:08 ` Vishwanatha Subbanna
2020-02-24 20:36 ` Patrick Williams
2020-02-25 2:01 ` Lei YU
2020-02-25 2:23 ` Patrick Williams
2020-04-27 10:34 ` Vishwanatha Subbanna
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200220163326.GC41328@patrickw3-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com \
--to=patrick@stwcx.xyz \
--cc=bradleyb@fuzziesquirrel.com \
--cc=openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=vishwa@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.