All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
To: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk, dan.j.williams@intel.com,
	peterz@infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] x86: fix bitops.h warning with a moved cast
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 12:30:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200225103050.GD10400@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200224225020.2212544-1-jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>

On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 02:50:19PM -0800, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> Fix many sparse warnings when building with C=1.
> 
> When the kernel is compiled with C=1, there are lots of messages like:
>   arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h:77:37: warning: cast truncates bits from constant value (ffffff7f becomes 7f)
> 
> CONST_MASK() is using a signed integer "1" to create the mask which
> is later cast to (u8) when used, in order to yield an 8-bit value
> for the assembly instructions to use. Simplify the expressions used to
> clearly indicate they are working on 8-bit values only, which still
> keeps sparse happy without an accidental promotion to a 32 bit integer.
> 

> The reason the warning was occurring is because certain bitmasks that
> end with a mask next to a natural boundary like 7, 15, 23, 31, end up
> with a mask like 0x7f, which then results in sign extension when doing
> an invert (but I'm not a compiler expert). It was really only
> "clear_bit" that was having problems, and it was only on bit checks next
> to a byte boundary (top bit).

I guess this describes it incorrectly.
The problem is integer promotion of negation operation for any bit basically.

For example, if we have bit 3 (nr = 3) and got it in the clear bit we will
get (according to what I see in the warnings) 0xfffffff7. Which is simple
~(1 << 3) promoted to integer.

I think it is a C standard which dictates this, compiler just follows.

> Verified with a test module (see next patch) and assembly inspection
> that the patch doesn't introduce any change in generated code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@intel.com>
> ---
> v5: changed code to use simple AND and XOR, updated commit message
> v4: reverse argument order as suggested by David Laight, added reviewed-by
> v3: Clean up the header file changes as per peterz.
> v2: use correct CC: list
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h
> index 062cdecb2f24..53f246e9df5a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/bitops.h
> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ arch_set_bit(long nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
>  	if (__builtin_constant_p(nr)) {
>  		asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "orb %1,%0"
>  			: CONST_MASK_ADDR(nr, addr)
> -			: "iq" ((u8)CONST_MASK(nr))
> +			: "iq" (CONST_MASK(nr) & 0xff)
>  			: "memory");
>  	} else {
>  		asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX __ASM_SIZE(bts) " %1,%0"
> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ arch_clear_bit(long nr, volatile unsigned long *addr)
>  	if (__builtin_constant_p(nr)) {
>  		asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX "andb %1,%0"
>  			: CONST_MASK_ADDR(nr, addr)
> -			: "iq" ((u8)~CONST_MASK(nr)));
> +			: "iq" (CONST_MASK(nr) ^ 0xff));
>  	} else {
>  		asm volatile(LOCK_PREFIX __ASM_SIZE(btr) " %1,%0"
>  			: : RLONG_ADDR(addr), "Ir" (nr) : "memory");
> 
> base-commit: ca7e1fd1026c5af6a533b4b5447e1d2f153e28f2
> -- 
> 2.24.1
> 

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-02-25 10:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-24 22:50 [PATCH v5 1/2] x86: fix bitops.h warning with a moved cast Jesse Brandeburg
2020-02-24 22:50 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] lib: make a test module with set/clear bit Jesse Brandeburg
2020-02-25 10:30 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2020-02-25 11:52   ` [PATCH v5 1/2] x86: fix bitops.h warning with a moved cast Andy Shevchenko
2020-02-25 12:50   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-10 22:22     ` Jesse Brandeburg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200225103050.GD10400@smile.fi.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.