From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: by 2002:a19:cb43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id b64csp1516068lfg; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 02:53:39 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwJtRH9Tm2jLGbK8RpAGDrdNbX68i/pXiUgeRUbiiBp/VwGose4z4PPEngU4COj6AtviJMf X-Received: by 2002:a9d:470a:: with SMTP id a10mr45006727otf.370.1582628018721; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 02:53:38 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1582628018; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=lzYhU9Ilg8wa+ew6XncgNKuTPLhYSbOkElnC6Hlf/V6cnTJsW2mOCNor2SW1BSjHM+ Xhs8AblZYMcrMdqFQ7bhYoYBFAmglQ3DAVKuuYplmWqAVKKwJipv2za58kJghhQ4AUtk wc97Wf9LxHG31THl6JGTNhbPPYgzx4bs7RUYgaBrjAeYW6ddc8nDlSiCRI0XRkgiqDtU 4PzRtLVsroB4d/K8k+JOFueMU3zNOsBkRCe5oCnxJjslmykCkmgAG6xgcLtshJMVPfTQ u11dqgikNJnd4fzy/uRhSFnD8CWA5AfqtwvNaRccpSTe5XUzU9gAolLv52awpYpg37+H LFCw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=FwVgg6pAG24Nwzl8TwwXLB6A8KzRtLr0RkxRfKsg1kI=; b=XYNhhXYIdJaJm32CDF0d/kmoXr0YKTAcS5lw0mJAXqnlchmodBIRw1hPADoRqf28f3 OCarmnnaAmR58cVv223+G2JVSS0qoNSisSwd0vH+kWKjRujl8Ae/REaxttulRZK7jsgY aU6JD8TuUq2OukzA1VgCo03dUHqgO/GJhPoTwliOSr/eNBTKdytPup+efw6R/A78eJc9 lyWD11L3rYBCPlH5nnRTav6fVACbY3/Xraq4ggKIYZI1sZxLMkwDqJOvawgbrpZHuryh LTtok//MF1jxAT2hsekYtASuXFvdywuy6KqG8gPfp16UjfO9eZTDOxLRhvdZEaboMUxT Sd3w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=NQr81VA8; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 94si7654206otw.297.2020.02.25.02.53.38; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 02:53:38 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=NQr81VA8; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730357AbgBYKxh (ORCPT + 5 others); Tue, 25 Feb 2020 05:53:37 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.120]:36104 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730186AbgBYKxh (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Feb 2020 05:53:37 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1582628015; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=FwVgg6pAG24Nwzl8TwwXLB6A8KzRtLr0RkxRfKsg1kI=; b=NQr81VA8vRQacj/VdqeZOB1ZF4B8AeNgkmY0dl+1v7f5CPI2Ob3Cgz9IuXryW6NhmpYdpV s5EjmgT3KfdAir7NpvD3/F5P+SVRqdhf15cp63+hvY7aR6pN4kXqPTVT9HP7+PYojGe9Th 0bhLoSrjUuR/jzBVA+Rvot/xgMi32Zk= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-460-XXhlPeqeO82GNhTF5Lcy4Q-1; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 05:53:33 -0500 X-MC-Unique: XXhlPeqeO82GNhTF5Lcy4Q-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94D2D477; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:53:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.43.2.114]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B74EA1001902; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:53:24 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 11:53:22 +0100 From: Igor Mammedov To: Peter Maydell Cc: Dongjiu Geng , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Xiao Guangrong , Shannon Zhao , Fam Zheng , Richard Henderson , Eduardo Habkost , Marcelo Tosatti , QEMU Developers , kvm-devel , qemu-arm , Paolo Bonzini , James Morse , Laszlo Ersek , Jonathan Cameron , Shameerali Kolothum Thodi , Zheng Xiang Subject: Re: [PATCH v24 02/10] hw/arm/virt: Introduce a RAS machine option Message-ID: <20200225115322.4344e589@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20200217131248.28273-1-gengdongjiu@huawei.com> <20200217131248.28273-3-gengdongjiu@huawei.com> <20200225093404.0ee40224@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org X-TUID: cKpz1jgn79Lq On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 08:54:07 +0000 Peter Maydell wrote: > On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 at 08:34, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > > > On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 21:12:40 +0800 > > Dongjiu Geng wrote: > > > > > RAS Virtualization feature is not supported now, so add a RAS machine > > > > > option and disable it by default. > > ^^^^ > > > > this doesn't match the patch. > > Hmm? It seems right to me -- the patch adds a machine option > and makes it disabled-by-default, doesn't it? Right, I misread 'and' as 'to' somehow. My apologies > > thanks > -- PMM > From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B9F8C35DF5 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:54:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBF2D21556 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:54:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="NQr81VA8" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org EBF2D21556 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:52418 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j6XrG-0002uz-3F for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 05:54:34 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37892) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j6XqO-0002U7-Rg for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 05:53:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j6XqK-0007SV-Te for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 05:53:40 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:50156 helo=us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j6XqK-0007SF-PY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 05:53:36 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1582628015; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=FwVgg6pAG24Nwzl8TwwXLB6A8KzRtLr0RkxRfKsg1kI=; b=NQr81VA8vRQacj/VdqeZOB1ZF4B8AeNgkmY0dl+1v7f5CPI2Ob3Cgz9IuXryW6NhmpYdpV s5EjmgT3KfdAir7NpvD3/F5P+SVRqdhf15cp63+hvY7aR6pN4kXqPTVT9HP7+PYojGe9Th 0bhLoSrjUuR/jzBVA+Rvot/xgMi32Zk= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-460-XXhlPeqeO82GNhTF5Lcy4Q-1; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 05:53:33 -0500 X-MC-Unique: XXhlPeqeO82GNhTF5Lcy4Q-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94D2D477; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:53:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.43.2.114]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B74EA1001902; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 10:53:24 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 11:53:22 +0100 From: Igor Mammedov To: Peter Maydell Subject: Re: [PATCH v24 02/10] hw/arm/virt: Introduce a RAS machine option Message-ID: <20200225115322.4344e589@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20200217131248.28273-1-gengdongjiu@huawei.com> <20200217131248.28273-3-gengdongjiu@huawei.com> <20200225093404.0ee40224@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 205.139.110.61 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Fam Zheng , Xiao Guangrong , kvm-devel , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Marcelo Tosatti , QEMU Developers , Eduardo Habkost , Dongjiu Geng , Shannon Zhao , Zheng Xiang , qemu-arm , James Morse , Shameerali Kolothum Thodi , Jonathan Cameron , Paolo Bonzini , Laszlo Ersek , Richard Henderson Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 08:54:07 +0000 Peter Maydell wrote: > On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 at 08:34, Igor Mammedov wrote: > > > > On Mon, 17 Feb 2020 21:12:40 +0800 > > Dongjiu Geng wrote: > > > > > RAS Virtualization feature is not supported now, so add a RAS machine > > > > > option and disable it by default. > > ^^^^ > > > > this doesn't match the patch. > > Hmm? It seems right to me -- the patch adds a machine option > and makes it disabled-by-default, doesn't it? Right, I misread 'and' as 'to' somehow. My apologies > > thanks > -- PMM >