From: "Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
To: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v18 3/8] drm/i915: Add intel_bw_get_*_state helpers
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 17:53:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200227155353.GQ13686@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200224153240.9047-4-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 05:32:35PM +0200, Stanislav Lisovskiy wrote:
> Add correspondent helpers to be able to get old/new bandwidth
> global state object.
>
> v2: - Fixed typo in function call
> v3: - Changed new functions naming to use convention proposed
> by Jani Nikula, i.e intel_bw_* in intel_bw.c file.
And now they no longer match the naming pattern used by all the
other simialr functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h | 9 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> index 58b264bc318d..bdad7476dc7b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.c
> @@ -374,8 +374,35 @@ static unsigned int intel_bw_data_rate(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> return data_rate;
> }
>
> -static struct intel_bw_state *
> -intel_atomic_get_bw_state(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> +struct intel_bw_state *
> +intel_bw_get_old_state(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> + struct intel_global_state *bw_state;
> +
> + bw_state = intel_atomic_get_old_global_obj_state(state, &dev_priv->bw_obj);
> + if (IS_ERR(bw_state))
> + return ERR_CAST(bw_state);
> +
> + return to_intel_bw_state(bw_state);
> +}
> +
> +struct intel_bw_state *
> +intel_bw_get_new_state(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> +{
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> + struct intel_global_state *bw_state;
> +
> + bw_state = intel_atomic_get_new_global_obj_state(state, &dev_priv->bw_obj);
> +
> + if (IS_ERR(bw_state))
> + return ERR_CAST(bw_state);
> +
> + return to_intel_bw_state(bw_state);
> +}
> +
> +struct intel_bw_state *
> +intel_bw_get_state(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> {
> struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(state->base.dev);
> struct intel_global_state *bw_state;
> @@ -420,7 +447,7 @@ int intel_bw_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state *state)
> old_active_planes == new_active_planes)
> continue;
>
> - bw_state = intel_atomic_get_bw_state(state);
> + bw_state = intel_bw_get_state(state);
> if (IS_ERR(bw_state))
> return PTR_ERR(bw_state);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h
> index a8aa7624c5aa..b5f61463922f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_bw.h
> @@ -24,6 +24,15 @@ struct intel_bw_state {
>
> #define to_intel_bw_state(x) container_of((x), struct intel_bw_state, base)
>
> +struct intel_bw_state *
> +intel_bw_get_old_state(struct intel_atomic_state *state);
> +
> +struct intel_bw_state *
> +intel_bw_get_new_state(struct intel_atomic_state *state);
> +
> +struct intel_bw_state *
> +intel_bw_get_state(struct intel_atomic_state *state);
> +
> void intel_bw_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> int intel_bw_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv);
> int intel_bw_atomic_check(struct intel_atomic_state *state);
> --
> 2.24.1.485.gad05a3d8e5
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-27 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-24 15:32 [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v18 0/8] Refactor Gen11+ SAGV support Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-02-24 15:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v18 1/8] drm/i915: Start passing latency as parameter Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-02-27 16:28 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-02-24 15:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v18 2/8] drm/i915: Introduce skl_plane_wm_level accessor Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-02-27 15:51 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-02-28 12:23 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-24 15:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v18 3/8] drm/i915: Add intel_bw_get_*_state helpers Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-02-27 15:53 ` Ville Syrjälä [this message]
2020-02-24 15:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v18 4/8] drm/i915: Introduce more *_state_changed indicators Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-02-25 14:57 ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-02-27 16:12 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-02-28 8:56 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-28 16:12 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-02-29 9:34 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-24 15:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v18 5/8] drm/i915: Refactor intel_can_enable_sagv Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-02-25 14:59 ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-02-27 11:46 ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-02-24 15:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v18 6/8] drm/i915: Added required new PCode commands Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-02-24 15:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v18 7/8] drm/i915: Restrict qgv points which don't have enough bandwidth Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-02-25 15:00 ` Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-02-27 16:20 ` Ville Syrjälä
2020-03-02 13:15 ` Lisovskiy, Stanislav
2020-02-24 15:32 ` [Intel-gfx] [PATCH v18 8/8] drm/i915: Enable SAGV support for Gen12 Stanislav Lisovskiy
2020-02-24 18:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Refactor Gen11+ SAGV support Patchwork
2020-02-24 18:39 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-02-24 19:04 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2020-02-26 22:00 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Refactor Gen11+ SAGV support (rev5) Patchwork
2020-02-26 22:02 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-02-26 22:26 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure " Patchwork
2020-02-27 15:33 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Refactor Gen11+ SAGV support (rev6) Patchwork
2020-02-27 15:35 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2020-02-27 15:56 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2020-02-28 17:22 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200227155353.GQ13686@intel.com \
--to=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.