From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
anshuman.khandual@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
suzuki.poulose@arm.com, Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: Linux-next-20200302: arm64 build failed
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 15:54:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200302135443.GA24831@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200302104726.GA7995@willie-the-truck>
On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 10:47:27AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> [+Anshuman and Catalin]
>
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 01:58:26PM +0530, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
> > Linux-Next 20200302 arm64 build failed due to below errors,
> > Suspecting patch causing this build break.
> >
> > 87d900aef3e2 arm/arm64: add support for folded p4d page tables
> >
> > Error log,
> > -------------
> > arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c: In function 'unmap_hotplug_pud_range':
> > include/linux/compiler.h:284:1: error: incompatible type for argument
> > 1 of 'p4d_page_paddr'
> > ({ \
> > ^
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h:270:45: note: in definition of macro
> > '__phys_to_virt'
> > #define __phys_to_virt(x) ((unsigned long)((x) - physvirt_offset))
> > ^
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h:629:42: note: in expansion of macro '__va'
> > #define pud_offset(dir, addr) ((pud_t *)__va(pud_offset_phys((dir), (addr))))
> > ^~~~
> > include/linux/compiler.h:293:22: note: in expansion of macro '__READ_ONCE'
> > #define READ_ONCE(x) __READ_ONCE(x, 1)
> > ^~~~~~~~~~~
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h:628:52: note: in expansion of macro 'READ_ONCE'
> > #define pud_offset_phys(dir, addr) (p4d_page_paddr(READ_ONCE(*(dir)))
> > + pud_index(addr) * sizeof(pud_t))
> > ^~~~~~~~~
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/pgtable.h:629:47: note: in expansion of macro
> > 'pud_offset_phys'
> > #define pud_offset(dir, addr) ((pud_t *)__va(pud_offset_phys((dir), (addr))))
> > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c:827:10: note: in expansion of macro 'pud_offset'
> > pudp = pud_offset(pgdp, addr);
> > ^~~~~~~~~~
>
> Looks like we need an implementation of unmap_hotplug_p4d_range() to
> walk the dummy p4d level. Unfortunately, we don't have the folded p4d
> patches in the arm64 tree so we'll either need a common branch or the
> hotplug patches will need to be dropped for the moment.
unmap_hotplug_p4d_range() is easy :)
From c7a5d08ff51ca2057b6b0289c4423bdfd7643518 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 15:53:17 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] arm64/mm: implement unmap_hotplug_p4d_range
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
index 05ec8e5f1436..c76b11577558 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
@@ -840,6 +840,24 @@ static void unmap_hotplug_pud_range(pgd_t *pgdp, unsigned long addr,
} while (addr = next, addr < end);
}
+static void unmap_hotplug_p4d_range(pgd_t *pgd, unsigned long addr,
+ unsigned long end, bool free_mapped)
+{
+ unsigned long next;
+ pgd_t *p4dp, p4d;
+
+ do {
+ next = p4d_addr_end(addr, end);
+ p4dp = p4d_offset(pgd, addr);
+ p4d = READ_ONCE(*p4dp);
+ if (p4d_none(p4d))
+ continue;
+
+ WARN_ON(!p4d_present(p4d));
+ unmap_hotplug_pud_range(p4dp, addr, next, free_mapped);
+ } while (addr = next, addr < end);
+}
+
static void unmap_hotplug_range(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
bool free_mapped)
{
@@ -854,7 +872,7 @@ static void unmap_hotplug_range(unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
continue;
WARN_ON(!pgd_present(pgd));
- unmap_hotplug_pud_range(pgdp, addr, next, free_mapped);
+ unmap_hotplug_p4d_range(pgdp, addr, next, free_mapped);
} while (addr = next, addr < end);
}
--
2.21.1
> Will
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-02 13:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-02 8:28 Linux-next-20200302: arm64 build failed Naresh Kamboju
2020-03-02 10:47 ` Will Deacon
2020-03-02 13:48 ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-03-02 13:54 ` Mike Rapoport [this message]
2020-03-02 17:45 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-03-02 22:24 ` Andrew Morton
2020-03-03 4:04 ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-03-03 16:28 ` Catalin Marinas
2020-03-04 2:26 ` Anshuman Khandual
2020-03-04 4:32 ` Anshuman Khandual
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200302135443.GA24831@linux.ibm.com \
--to=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anders.roxell@linaro.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.