From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luis Chamberlain Subject: Re: [RFC v2 21/37] lkl tools: "boot" test Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 19:51:16 +0000 Message-ID: <20200302195116.GF11244@42.do-not-panic.com> References: <20200123193315.132434-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-pl1-f194.google.com ([209.85.214.194]:44354 "EHLO mail-pl1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726791AbgCBTvT (ORCPT ); Mon, 2 Mar 2020 14:51:19 -0500 Received: by mail-pl1-f194.google.com with SMTP id d9so191198plo.11 for ; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 11:51:18 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200123193315.132434-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> Sender: linux-arch-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Brendan Higgins Cc: kunit-dev@googlegroups.com, Hajime Tazaki , Octavian Purdila , David Gow , Aleksa Sarai , linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Patrick Collins , Conrad Meyer , Motomu Utsumi , Lai Jiangshan , Akira Moroo , Petros Angelatos , Yuan Liu , Thomas Liebetraut , Mark Stillwell , David Disseldorp , linux-kernel-library@freelists.org, Luca Dariz On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 11:33:15AM -0800, Brendan Higgins wrote: > Luis, > > Does this kind of match what you were thinking with the syscall testing? Without looking too deeply into the code, it seems to be the case. Are you going to expose / port kunit to tools/ to allow usersapace to run kunit tests? > In any case, I am excited about this. Please keep me posted in the > future! Yes please Cc me too. Luis From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pj1-f67.google.com ([209.85.216.67]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1j8r5z-0003g9-AW for linux-um@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 19:51:20 +0000 Received: by mail-pj1-f67.google.com with SMTP id 12so232910pjb.5 for ; Mon, 02 Mar 2020 11:51:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2020 19:51:16 +0000 From: Luis Chamberlain Subject: Re: [RFC v2 21/37] lkl tools: "boot" test Message-ID: <20200302195116.GF11244@42.do-not-panic.com> References: <20200123193315.132434-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200123193315.132434-1-brendanhiggins@google.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-um" Errors-To: linux-um-bounces+geert=linux-m68k.org@lists.infradead.org To: Brendan Higgins Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Mark Stillwell , Conrad Meyer , Octavian Purdila , Lai Jiangshan , Motomu Utsumi , linux-um@lists.infradead.org, Akira Moroo , Petros Angelatos , Yuan Liu , Aleksa Sarai , linux-kernel-library@freelists.org, Thomas Liebetraut , David Gow , David Disseldorp , Patrick Collins , Luca Dariz , Hajime Tazaki , kunit-dev@googlegroups.com On Thu, Jan 23, 2020 at 11:33:15AM -0800, Brendan Higgins wrote: > Luis, > > Does this kind of match what you were thinking with the syscall testing? Without looking too deeply into the code, it seems to be the case. Are you going to expose / port kunit to tools/ to allow usersapace to run kunit tests? > In any case, I am excited about this. Please keep me posted in the > future! Yes please Cc me too. Luis _______________________________________________ linux-um mailing list linux-um@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-um