From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============6432329573450151905==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Peter Zijlstra To: kbuild-all@lists.01.org Subject: Re: [peterz-queue:core/rcu 31/33] arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c:961:26: error: inlining failed in call to always_inline 'try_get_desc': function attribute mismatch Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2020 10:51:27 +0100 Message-ID: <20200306095127.GE3348@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> In-Reply-To: List-Id: --===============6432329573450151905== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 06:34:49AM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote: > Say, consider, poke_int3_handler > gets inlines in LTO build, and compiler says: you know what, I am just > going to silently ignore your no_sanitize attribute to give you fun of > re-debugging the issue you think you fixed ;) *groan*, can't LTO still mess things up when combining translation units build with different sanitize flags? --===============6432329573450151905==--