All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
To: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
Cc: beilei.xing@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ice: remove bulk alloc compile option
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2020 12:13:18 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200308041318.GC18727@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200306084626.GB18727@intel.com>

On 03/06, Ye Xiaolong wrote:
>Hi, Qi
>
>Thanks for the cleanup.
>
>On 03/04, Qi Zhang wrote:
>>Remove CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ICE_RX_ALLOW_BULK_ALLOC with below
>>consideration:
>>
>>1. a default Rx path can always be selected by setting a proper
>>   rx_free_thresh value at runtime, see
>>   ice_check_rx_burst_bulk_alloc_preconditions.
>>
>>2. its not a big deal to always reserve more space for desc ring.
>>   "ring_size = (uint16_t)(rxq->nb_rx_desc + ICE_RX_MAX_BURST);"
>>
>>3. Fixes a potential invalid memory access in ice_reset_rx_queue.
>>   if CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ICE_RX_ALLOW_BULK_ALLOC is turned on while
>>   ice_check_rx_burst_bulk_alloc_preconditions return fail.
>>   below code will have problem.
>>
>>   for (i = 0; i < ICE_RX_MAX_BURST; ++i)
>>   	rxq->sw_ring[rxq->nb_rx_desc + i].mbuf = &rxq->fake_mbuf;
>>
>>Fixes: 50370662b727 ("net/ice: support device and queue ops")
>>Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>
>>Signed-off-by: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
>>---
>> config/common_base         |  1 -
>> doc/guides/nics/ice.rst    |  4 ---
>> drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx.c | 64 ++++++++++------------------------------------
>> 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 56 deletions(-)
>>
>>diff --git a/config/common_base b/config/common_base
>>index 7ca2f28b1..c31175f9d 100644
>>--- a/config/common_base
>>+++ b/config/common_base
>>@@ -337,7 +337,6 @@ CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ICE_PMD=y
>> CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ICE_DEBUG_RX=n
>> CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ICE_DEBUG_TX=n
>> CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ICE_DEBUG_TX_FREE=n
>>-CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ICE_RX_ALLOW_BULK_ALLOC=y
>> CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ICE_16BYTE_RX_DESC=n
>> 
>> # Compile burst-oriented IAVF PMD driver
>>diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/ice.rst b/doc/guides/nics/ice.rst
>>index cde3fd620..8af32dabf 100644
>>--- a/doc/guides/nics/ice.rst
>>+++ b/doc/guides/nics/ice.rst
>>@@ -54,10 +54,6 @@ Please note that enabling debugging options may affect system performance.
>> 
>>   Toggle display of generic debugging messages.
>> 
>>-- ``CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ICE_RX_ALLOW_BULK_ALLOC`` (default ``y``)
>>-
>>-  Toggle bulk allocation for RX.
>>-
>> - ``CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ICE_16BYTE_RX_DESC`` (default ``n``)
>> 
>>   Toggle to use a 16-byte RX descriptor, by default the RX descriptor is 32 byte.
>>diff --git a/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx.c
>>index 60c411bfa..c7e5fc484 100644
>>--- a/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx.c
>>+++ b/drivers/net/ice/ice_rxtx.c
>>@@ -236,17 +236,15 @@ _ice_rx_queue_release_mbufs(struct ice_rx_queue *rxq)
>> 			rxq->sw_ring[i].mbuf = NULL;
>> 		}
>> 	}
>>-#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_ICE_RX_ALLOW_BULK_ALLOC
>>-		if (rxq->rx_nb_avail == 0)
>>-			return;
>>-		for (i = 0; i < rxq->rx_nb_avail; i++) {
>>-			struct rte_mbuf *mbuf;
>>-
>>-			mbuf = rxq->rx_stage[rxq->rx_next_avail + i];
>>-			rte_pktmbuf_free_seg(mbuf);
>>-		}
>>-		rxq->rx_nb_avail = 0;
>>-#endif /* RTE_LIBRTE_ICE_RX_ALLOW_BULK_ALLOC */
>>+	if (rxq->rx_nb_avail == 0)
>>+		return;
>>+	for (i = 0; i < rxq->rx_nb_avail; i++) {
>>+		struct rte_mbuf *mbuf;
>>+
>>+		mbuf = rxq->rx_stage[rxq->rx_next_avail + i];
>>+		rte_pktmbuf_free_seg(mbuf);
>>+	}
>
>How about just
>
>	for (i = 0; i < rxq->rx_nb_avail; i++)
>		rte_pktmbuf_free_seg(rxq->rx_stage[rxq->rx_next_avail + i]);
>
>[snip]
>
>For the rest,
>
>Acked-by: Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
>
>And can this cleanup be applied to i40e as well? I think it's good to have 
>less configurations generally.
>
>Thanks,
>Xiaolong

Applied to dpdk-next-net-intel with above change, Thanks.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-08  4:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-04 11:40 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ice: remove bulk alloc compile option Qi Zhang
2020-03-06  8:46 ` Ye Xiaolong
2020-03-06 23:29   ` Zhang, Qi Z
2020-03-08  4:13   ` Ye Xiaolong [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-03-04 11:39 Qi Zhang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200308041318.GC18727@intel.com \
    --to=xiaolong.ye@intel.com \
    --cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.