From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
Gal Pressman <galpress@amazon.com>,
linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Mark Zhang <markz@mellanox.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@mellanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 2/9] RDMA: Promote field_avail() macro to be general code
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2020 09:18:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200308071858.GR184088@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200305151850.GZ26318@mellanox.com>
On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 11:18:50AM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 05:00:58PM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> >
> > +/**
> > + * FIELD_SIZEOF - get the size of a struct's field
> > + * @t: the target struct
> > + * @f: the target struct's field
> > + * Return: the size of @f in the struct definition without having a
> > + * declared instance of @t.
> > + */
> > +#define FIELD_SIZEOF(t, f) (sizeof(((t*)0)->f))
>
> This is already sizeof_field
Ohh, thanks
>
> > +/**
> > + * field_avail - check if specific field exists in provided data
> > + * @x: the source data, usually struct received from the user
> > + * @fld: field name
> > + * @sz: size of the data
> > + */
> > +#define field_avail(x, fld, sz) \
> > + (offsetof(typeof(x), fld) + FIELD_SIZEOF(typeof(x), fld) <= (sz))
>
> This is just offsetofend, I'm not sure there is such a reason to even
> have this field_avail macro really..
Even better.
Thanks
>
> Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-08 7:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-05 15:00 [PATCH rdma-next 0/9] Add Enhanced Connection Established (ECE) Leon Romanovsky
2020-03-05 15:00 ` [PATCH rdma-next 1/9] RDMA/cm: Add Enhanced Connection Establishment (ECE) bits Leon Romanovsky
2020-03-05 15:00 ` [PATCH rdma-next 2/9] RDMA: Promote field_avail() macro to be general code Leon Romanovsky
2020-03-05 15:18 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-03-08 7:18 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
2020-03-05 15:00 ` [PATCH rdma-next 3/9] RDMA/cm: Delete not implemented CM peer to peer communication Leon Romanovsky
2020-03-05 15:01 ` [PATCH rdma-next 4/9] RDMA/uapi: Add ECE definitions to UCMA Leon Romanovsky
2020-03-05 15:01 ` [PATCH rdma-next 5/9] RDMA/ucma: Extend ucma_connect to receive ECE parameters Leon Romanovsky
2020-03-05 15:01 ` [PATCH rdma-next 6/9] RDMA/ucma: Deliver ECE parameters through UCMA events Leon Romanovsky
2020-03-05 15:01 ` [PATCH rdma-next 7/9] RDMA/cm: Send and receive ECE parameter over the wire Leon Romanovsky
2020-03-05 15:01 ` [PATCH rdma-next 8/9] RDMA/cma: Connect ECE to rdma_accept Leon Romanovsky
2020-03-05 15:01 ` [PATCH rdma-next 9/9] RDMA/cma: Provide ECE reject reason Leon Romanovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200308071858.GR184088@unreal \
--to=leon@kernel.org \
--cc=dledford@redhat.com \
--cc=galpress@amazon.com \
--cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markz@mellanox.com \
--cc=yishaih@mellanox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.