From: Martin Varghese <martinvarghesenokia@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
martin.varghese@nokia.com, Taehee Yoo <ap420073@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] bareudp: Fixed bareudp receive handling
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 06:26:13 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200311005613.GA18516@martin-VirtualBox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <89faace0-7c11-b338-282b-b9e409677ba4@gmail.com>
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 10:28:40AM -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>
> On 3/10/20 10:02 AM, Martin Varghese wrote:
> > From: Martin Varghese <martin.varghese@nokia.com>
> >
> > Reverted commit "2baecda bareudp: remove unnecessary udp_encap_enable() in
> > bareudp_socket_create()"
> >
> > An explicit call to udp_encap_enable is needed as the setup_udp_tunnel_sock
> > does not call udp_encap_enable if the if the socket is of type v6.
> >
> > Bareudp device uses v6 socket to receive v4 & v6 traffic
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Varghese <martin.varghese@nokia.com>
> > Fixes: 2baecda37f4e ("bareudp: remove unnecessary udp_encap_enable() in bareudp_socket_create()")
>
> Please CC the author of recent patches, do not hide,
> and to be clear, it is not about blaming, just information.
>
You mean the author of 2baecda37f4e ("bareudp: remove unnecessary udp_encap_enable() in bareudp_socket_create()") ?
yes i will do.
> > ---
> > drivers/net/bareudp.c | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/bareudp.c b/drivers/net/bareudp.c
> > index 71a2f48..c9d0d68 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/bareudp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/bareudp.c
> > @@ -250,6 +250,9 @@ static int bareudp_socket_create(struct bareudp_dev *bareudp, __be16 port)
> > tunnel_cfg.encap_destroy = NULL;
> > setup_udp_tunnel_sock(bareudp->net, sock, &tunnel_cfg);
> >
>
> This might need a comment.
>
> Can this condition be false ?
>
If the IPv6 is disabled the socket type will be v4 and there is no need of explicit call to
udp_encap_enable
> According to your changelog, it seems not.
>
> Give to reviewers more chance to avoid future mistakes.
>
You mean add a comment?
> Thanks.
>
> > + if (sock->sk->sk_family == AF_INET6)
> > + udp_encap_enable();
> > +
> > rcu_assign_pointer(bareudp->sock, sock);
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-11 0:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-10 17:02 [PATCH net-next] bareudp: Fixed bareudp receive handling Martin Varghese
2020-03-10 17:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2020-03-11 0:56 ` Martin Varghese [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200311005613.GA18516@martin-VirtualBox \
--to=martinvarghesenokia@gmail.com \
--cc=ap420073@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=martin.varghese@nokia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.