From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jeff Vander Stoep <jeffv@google.com>,
Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kmod: make request_module() return an error when autoloading is disabled
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2020 10:28:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202003111026.2BBE41C@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200310223731.126894-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 03:37:31PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
>
> It's long been possible to disable kernel module autoloading completely
> by setting /proc/sys/kernel/modprobe to the empty string. This can be
Hunh. I've never seen that before. :) I've always used;
echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/modules_disabled
Regardless,
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
-Kees
> preferable to setting it to a nonexistent file since it avoids the
> overhead of an attempted execve(), avoids potential deadlocks, and
> avoids the call to security_kernel_module_request() and thus on
> SELinux-based systems eliminates the need to write SELinux rules to
> dontaudit module_request.
>
> However, when module autoloading is disabled in this way,
> request_module() returns 0. This is broken because callers expect 0 to
> mean that the module was successfully loaded.
>
> Apparently this was never noticed because this method of disabling
> module autoloading isn't used much, and also most callers don't use the
> return value of request_module() since it's always necessary to check
> whether the module registered its functionality or not anyway. But
> improperly returning 0 can indeed confuse a few callers, for example
> get_fs_type() in fs/filesystems.c where it causes a WARNING to be hit:
>
> if (!fs && (request_module("fs-%.*s", len, name) == 0)) {
> fs = __get_fs_type(name, len);
> WARN_ONCE(!fs, "request_module fs-%.*s succeeded, but still no fs?\n", len, name);
> }
>
> This is easily reproduced with:
>
> echo > /proc/sys/kernel/modprobe
> mount -t NONEXISTENT none /
>
> It causes:
>
> request_module fs-NONEXISTENT succeeded, but still no fs?
> WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 1106 at fs/filesystems.c:275 get_fs_type+0xd6/0xf0
> [...]
>
> Arguably this warning is broken and should be removed, since the module
> could have been unloaded already. However, request_module() should also
> correctly return an error when it fails. So let's make it return
> -ENOENT, which matches the error when the modprobe binary doesn't exist.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> Cc: Jeff Vander Stoep <jeffv@google.com>
> Cc: Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> ---
> kernel/kmod.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kmod.c b/kernel/kmod.c
> index bc6addd9152b..a2de58de6ab6 100644
> --- a/kernel/kmod.c
> +++ b/kernel/kmod.c
> @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static int call_modprobe(char *module_name, int wait)
> * invoke it.
> *
> * If module auto-loading support is disabled then this function
> - * becomes a no-operation.
> + * simply returns -ENOENT.
> */
> int __request_module(bool wait, const char *fmt, ...)
> {
> @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ int __request_module(bool wait, const char *fmt, ...)
> WARN_ON_ONCE(wait && current_is_async());
>
> if (!modprobe_path[0])
> - return 0;
> + return -ENOENT;
>
> va_start(args, fmt);
> ret = vsnprintf(module_name, MODULE_NAME_LEN, fmt, args);
> --
> 2.25.1.481.gfbce0eb801-goog
>
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-11 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-10 22:37 [PATCH] kmod: make request_module() return an error when autoloading is disabled Eric Biggers
2020-03-11 4:32 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-03-11 5:26 ` Eric Biggers
2020-03-11 6:31 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-03-11 17:35 ` Eric Biggers
2020-03-11 18:00 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-03-11 18:21 ` Eric Biggers
2020-03-11 18:40 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-03-11 5:55 ` Josh Triplett
2020-03-11 6:32 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-03-11 17:28 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2020-03-11 17:41 ` Eric Biggers
2020-03-11 17:50 ` Kees Cook
2020-03-11 18:01 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-03-11 18:08 ` Eric Biggers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202003111026.2BBE41C@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jeffv@google.com \
--cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.