From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE78FC10DCE for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 08:18:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4AFB2071C for ; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 08:18:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725978AbgCLISb (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Mar 2020 04:18:31 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:35390 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725268AbgCLISa (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Mar 2020 04:18:30 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 8726E68C65; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 09:18:27 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 09:18:27 +0100 From: "hch@lst.de" To: "Rantala, Tommi T. (Nokia - FI/Espoo)" Cc: "hch@lst.de" , "darrick.wong@oracle.com" , "david@fromorbit.com" , "linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: 5.5 XFS getdents regression? Message-ID: <20200312081827.GA10247@lst.de> References: <72c5fd8e9a23dde619f70f21b8100752ec63e1d2.camel@nokia.com> <20200310221406.GO10776@dread.disaster.area> <862b6c718957aff7156bf04964b7242f5075e8a7.camel@nokia.com> <20200311172234.GA26340@lst.de> <1a10a2ec66bd9c72ef317f7a0834b30e6b739e8e.camel@nokia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1a10a2ec66bd9c72ef317f7a0834b30e6b739e8e.camel@nokia.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 08:09:53AM +0000, Rantala, Tommi T. (Nokia - FI/Espoo) wrote: > > Thanks, this looks good. Although I wonder if the slightly different > > version below might be a little more elegant? > > Yes that's better indeed, thanks! As this is just a slight tweak on all your work, can you submit it with your signoff and a Fixes a tag? Thanks for all your work!