Re: Some Alphas broken by f75b99d5a77d (PCI: Enforce bus address limits in resource allocation)

[Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>]

On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 09:28:33PM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 12:41 PM Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 8, 2020 at 8:30 AM Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru> wrote:
> > > Wholeheartedly agree. In fact, changes to generic PCI code required
> > > for proper root bus sizing are quite minimal now since we have
> > > struct pci_host_bridge. It's mostly additional checks for bus->self
> > > being NULL (as it normally is on the root bus) in the
> > > __pci_bus_size_bridges() path, plus new bridge->size_windows flag.
> > > See patch below (tested on UP1500). Note that on irongate we're
> > > only interested in calculation of non-prefetchable PCI memory aperture,
> > > but one can do the same for io and prefetchable memory as well.
> >
> > Thanks Ivan! The patch works for me as well.
> 
> Bjorn, what would you like the next step to be?
> 
> If the PCI bits are fine with you, I assume you'd like them to go
> through your tree, etc? I'm perfectly happy to see the alpha bits go
> through the same tree.

Yes, I think this looks reasonable.  We should get this posted in the
usual format (commit log, signed-off-by, etc), and then get it into
-next to see how it flies.

Bjorn