From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Artem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>,
grant.likely@arm.com, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/3] driver core: Break infinite loop when deferred probe can't be satisfied
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2020 10:50:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200313085030.GO1922688@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3b0586f4-0af4-3a17-7a4b-e73910f66bff@ti.com>
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 09:35:55AM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 12/03/2020 12.54, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 10:32:32AM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> >> On 09/03/2020 16.11, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
...
> >> Reviewed-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>
> >
> > Thank you, Peter!
> >
> > Yes, under "successful probe" we understand the one that has stayed probed
> > after the deferred trigger cycle. That's why a decrement counter is essential
> > to make this scheme work.
> >
> > Ideally I would like to get Grant's comment on / test of this...
>
> I fixed up Grant's email address to get his attention you are seeking for...
Ah, thank you!
How can I forget that he moved to ARM while ago? Grant, I may re-send series
with your address corrected if it feels better to you.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-13 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-09 14:11 [PATCH v1 1/3] driver core: Break infinite loop when deferred probe can't be satisfied Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-09 14:11 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] driver core: Read atomic counter once in driver_probe_done() Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-18 23:49 ` Ferry Toth
2020-03-09 14:11 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] driver core: Replace open-coded list_last_entry() Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-11 8:32 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] driver core: Break infinite loop when deferred probe can't be satisfied Peter Ujfalusi
2020-03-12 10:54 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-03-13 7:35 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2020-03-13 8:50 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2020-03-18 23:47 ` Ferry Toth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200313085030.GO1922688@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=a.hajda@samsung.com \
--cc=artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com \
--cc=balbi@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=grant.likely@arm.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.