From: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
jsnow@redhat.com
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Fam Zheng <fam@euphon.net>,
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>,
libvir-list@redhat.com, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: [PULL 05/10] block/dirty-bitmap: switch _next_dirty_area and _next_zero to int64_t
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 00:38:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200317043819.20197-6-jsnow@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200317043819.20197-1-jsnow@redhat.com>
From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
We are going to introduce bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_dirty so that same
variable may be used to store its return value and to be its parameter,
so it would int64_t.
Similarly, we are going to refactor hbitmap_next_dirty_area to use
hbitmap_next_dirty together with hbitmap_next_zero, therefore we want
hbitmap_next_zero parameter type to be int64_t too.
So, for convenience update all parameters of *_next_zero and
*_next_dirty_area to be int64_t.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Message-id: 20200205112041.6003-6-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
---
include/block/dirty-bitmap.h | 6 +++---
include/qemu/hbitmap.h | 7 +++----
block/dirty-bitmap.c | 6 +++---
nbd/server.c | 2 +-
tests/test-hbitmap.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
util/hbitmap.c | 13 ++++++++-----
6 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/block/dirty-bitmap.h b/include/block/dirty-bitmap.h
index e2b20ecab9..27c72cc56a 100644
--- a/include/block/dirty-bitmap.h
+++ b/include/block/dirty-bitmap.h
@@ -105,10 +105,10 @@ for (bitmap = bdrv_dirty_bitmap_first(bs); bitmap; \
bitmap = bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next(bitmap))
char *bdrv_dirty_bitmap_sha256(const BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap, Error **errp);
-int64_t bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_zero(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap, uint64_t offset,
- uint64_t bytes);
+int64_t bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_zero(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap, int64_t offset,
+ int64_t bytes);
bool bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_dirty_area(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap,
- uint64_t *offset, uint64_t *bytes);
+ int64_t *offset, int64_t *bytes);
BdrvDirtyBitmap *bdrv_reclaim_dirty_bitmap_locked(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap,
Error **errp);
diff --git a/include/qemu/hbitmap.h b/include/qemu/hbitmap.h
index df922d8517..b6e85f3d5d 100644
--- a/include/qemu/hbitmap.h
+++ b/include/qemu/hbitmap.h
@@ -304,10 +304,10 @@ void hbitmap_iter_init(HBitmapIter *hbi, const HBitmap *hb, uint64_t first);
* @hb: The HBitmap to operate on
* @start: The bit to start from.
* @count: Number of bits to proceed. If @start+@count > bitmap size, the whole
- * bitmap is looked through. You can use UINT64_MAX as @count to search up to
+ * bitmap is looked through. You can use INT64_MAX as @count to search up to
* the bitmap end.
*/
-int64_t hbitmap_next_zero(const HBitmap *hb, uint64_t start, uint64_t count);
+int64_t hbitmap_next_zero(const HBitmap *hb, int64_t start, int64_t count);
/* hbitmap_next_dirty_area:
* @hb: The HBitmap to operate on
@@ -322,8 +322,7 @@ int64_t hbitmap_next_zero(const HBitmap *hb, uint64_t start, uint64_t count);
* @offset and @bytes appropriately. Otherwise returns false and leaves @offset
* and @bytes unchanged.
*/
-bool hbitmap_next_dirty_area(const HBitmap *hb, uint64_t *start,
- uint64_t *count);
+bool hbitmap_next_dirty_area(const HBitmap *hb, int64_t *start, int64_t *count);
/**
* hbitmap_iter_next:
diff --git a/block/dirty-bitmap.c b/block/dirty-bitmap.c
index 7039e82520..af9f5411a6 100644
--- a/block/dirty-bitmap.c
+++ b/block/dirty-bitmap.c
@@ -860,14 +860,14 @@ char *bdrv_dirty_bitmap_sha256(const BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap, Error **errp)
return hbitmap_sha256(bitmap->bitmap, errp);
}
-int64_t bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_zero(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap, uint64_t offset,
- uint64_t bytes)
+int64_t bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_zero(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap, int64_t offset,
+ int64_t bytes)
{
return hbitmap_next_zero(bitmap->bitmap, offset, bytes);
}
bool bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_dirty_area(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap,
- uint64_t *offset, uint64_t *bytes)
+ int64_t *offset, int64_t *bytes)
{
return hbitmap_next_dirty_area(bitmap->bitmap, offset, bytes);
}
diff --git a/nbd/server.c b/nbd/server.c
index 11a31094ff..3106aaf3b4 100644
--- a/nbd/server.c
+++ b/nbd/server.c
@@ -2055,7 +2055,7 @@ static unsigned int bitmap_to_extents(BdrvDirtyBitmap *bitmap, uint64_t offset,
bool next_dirty = !dirty;
if (dirty) {
- end = bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_zero(bitmap, begin, UINT64_MAX);
+ end = bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_zero(bitmap, begin, INT64_MAX);
} else {
bdrv_set_dirty_iter(it, begin);
end = bdrv_dirty_iter_next(it);
diff --git a/tests/test-hbitmap.c b/tests/test-hbitmap.c
index aeaa0b3f22..9d210dc18c 100644
--- a/tests/test-hbitmap.c
+++ b/tests/test-hbitmap.c
@@ -817,8 +817,8 @@ static void test_hbitmap_iter_and_reset(TestHBitmapData *data,
}
static void test_hbitmap_next_zero_check_range(TestHBitmapData *data,
- uint64_t start,
- uint64_t count)
+ int64_t start,
+ int64_t count)
{
int64_t ret1 = hbitmap_next_zero(data->hb, start, count);
int64_t ret2 = start;
@@ -837,7 +837,7 @@ static void test_hbitmap_next_zero_check_range(TestHBitmapData *data,
static void test_hbitmap_next_zero_check(TestHBitmapData *data, int64_t start)
{
- test_hbitmap_next_zero_check_range(data, start, UINT64_MAX);
+ test_hbitmap_next_zero_check_range(data, start, INT64_MAX);
}
static void test_hbitmap_next_zero_do(TestHBitmapData *data, int granularity)
@@ -905,11 +905,11 @@ static void test_hbitmap_next_zero_after_truncate(TestHBitmapData *data,
}
static void test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(TestHBitmapData *data,
- uint64_t offset,
- uint64_t count)
+ int64_t offset,
+ int64_t count)
{
- uint64_t off1, off2;
- uint64_t len1 = 0, len2;
+ int64_t off1, off2;
+ int64_t len1 = 0, len2;
bool ret1, ret2;
int64_t end;
@@ -945,24 +945,24 @@ static void test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_do(TestHBitmapData *data,
int granularity)
{
hbitmap_test_init(data, L3, granularity);
- test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, 0, UINT64_MAX);
+ test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, 0, INT64_MAX);
test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, 0, 1);
test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, L3 - 1, 1);
hbitmap_set(data->hb, L2, 1);
test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, 0, 1);
test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, 0, L2);
- test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, 0, UINT64_MAX);
- test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, L2 - 1, UINT64_MAX);
+ test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, 0, INT64_MAX);
+ test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, L2 - 1, INT64_MAX);
test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, L2 - 1, 1);
test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, L2 - 1, 2);
test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, L2 - 1, 3);
- test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, L2, UINT64_MAX);
+ test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, L2, INT64_MAX);
test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, L2, 1);
test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, L2 + 1, 1);
hbitmap_set(data->hb, L2 + 5, L1);
- test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, 0, UINT64_MAX);
+ test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, 0, INT64_MAX);
test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, L2 - 2, 8);
test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, L2 + 1, 5);
test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, L2 + 1, 3);
@@ -974,16 +974,16 @@ static void test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_do(TestHBitmapData *data,
test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, L2 + 1, 0);
hbitmap_set(data->hb, L2 * 2, L3 - L2 * 2);
- test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, 0, UINT64_MAX);
- test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, L2, UINT64_MAX);
- test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, L2 + 1, UINT64_MAX);
- test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, L2 + 5 + L1 - 1, UINT64_MAX);
+ test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, 0, INT64_MAX);
+ test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, L2, INT64_MAX);
+ test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, L2 + 1, INT64_MAX);
+ test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, L2 + 5 + L1 - 1, INT64_MAX);
test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, L2 + 5 + L1, 5);
test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, L2 * 2 - L1, L1 + 1);
test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, L2 * 2, L2);
hbitmap_set(data->hb, 0, L3);
- test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, 0, UINT64_MAX);
+ test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, 0, INT64_MAX);
}
static void test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_0(TestHBitmapData *data,
@@ -1010,7 +1010,7 @@ static void test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_after_truncate(TestHBitmapData *data,
hbitmap_test_init(data, L1, 0);
hbitmap_test_truncate_impl(data, L1 * 2);
hbitmap_set(data->hb, L1 + 1, 1);
- test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, 0, UINT64_MAX);
+ test_hbitmap_next_dirty_area_check(data, 0, INT64_MAX);
}
int main(int argc, char **argv)
diff --git a/util/hbitmap.c b/util/hbitmap.c
index b6d4b99a06..df22f06be6 100644
--- a/util/hbitmap.c
+++ b/util/hbitmap.c
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ void hbitmap_iter_init(HBitmapIter *hbi, const HBitmap *hb, uint64_t first)
}
}
-int64_t hbitmap_next_zero(const HBitmap *hb, uint64_t start, uint64_t count)
+int64_t hbitmap_next_zero(const HBitmap *hb, int64_t start, int64_t count)
{
size_t pos = (start >> hb->granularity) >> BITS_PER_LEVEL;
unsigned long *last_lev = hb->levels[HBITMAP_LEVELS - 1];
@@ -202,6 +202,8 @@ int64_t hbitmap_next_zero(const HBitmap *hb, uint64_t start, uint64_t count)
uint64_t end_bit, sz;
int64_t res;
+ assert(start >= 0 && count >= 0);
+
if (start >= hb->orig_size || count == 0) {
return -1;
}
@@ -244,14 +246,15 @@ int64_t hbitmap_next_zero(const HBitmap *hb, uint64_t start, uint64_t count)
return res;
}
-bool hbitmap_next_dirty_area(const HBitmap *hb, uint64_t *start,
- uint64_t *count)
+bool hbitmap_next_dirty_area(const HBitmap *hb, int64_t *start, int64_t *count)
{
HBitmapIter hbi;
int64_t firt_dirty_off, area_end;
uint32_t granularity = 1UL << hb->granularity;
uint64_t end;
+ assert(*start >= 0 && *count >= 0);
+
if (*start >= hb->orig_size || *count == 0) {
return false;
}
@@ -834,8 +837,8 @@ bool hbitmap_can_merge(const HBitmap *a, const HBitmap *b)
*/
static void hbitmap_sparse_merge(HBitmap *dst, const HBitmap *src)
{
- uint64_t offset = 0;
- uint64_t count = src->orig_size;
+ int64_t offset = 0;
+ int64_t count = src->orig_size;
while (hbitmap_next_dirty_area(src, &offset, &count)) {
hbitmap_set(dst, offset, count);
--
2.21.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-17 4:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-17 4:38 [PULL 00/10] Bitmaps patches John Snow
2020-03-17 4:38 ` [PULL 01/10] hbitmap: assert that we don't create bitmap larger than INT64_MAX John Snow
2020-03-17 4:38 ` [PULL 02/10] hbitmap: move hbitmap_iter_next_word to hbitmap.c John Snow
2020-03-17 4:38 ` [PULL 03/10] hbitmap: unpublish hbitmap_iter_skip_words John Snow
2020-03-17 4:38 ` [PULL 04/10] hbitmap: drop meta bitmaps as they are unused John Snow
2020-03-17 4:38 ` John Snow [this message]
2020-03-17 4:38 ` [PULL 06/10] block/dirty-bitmap: add _next_dirty API John Snow
2020-03-17 4:38 ` [PULL 07/10] block/dirty-bitmap: improve _next_dirty_area API John Snow
2020-03-17 4:38 ` [PULL 08/10] nbd/server: introduce NBDExtentArray John Snow
2020-03-17 4:38 ` [PULL 09/10] nbd/server: use bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_dirty_area John Snow
2020-03-17 4:38 ` [PULL 10/10] block/qcow2-bitmap: use bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_dirty John Snow
2020-03-17 14:00 ` [PULL 00/10] Bitmaps patches Peter Maydell
2020-03-17 14:40 ` Eric Blake
2020-03-17 14:57 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-03-17 15:00 ` Peter Maydell
2020-03-17 15:05 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-03-17 15:07 ` Peter Maydell
2020-03-17 15:11 ` Daniel P. Berrangé
2020-03-17 15:49 ` Eric Blake
2020-03-18 12:47 ` Eric Blake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200317043819.20197-6-jsnow@redhat.com \
--to=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.