From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiri Olsa Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/11] perf/tools: Enhance JSON/metric infrastructure to handle "?" Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 16:10:47 +0100 Message-ID: <20200317151047.GF757893@krava> References: <20200317062333.14555-1-kjain@linux.ibm.com> <20200317062333.14555-10-kjain@linux.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200317062333.14555-10-kjain@linux.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Kajol Jain Cc: acme@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com, maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org, yao.jin@linux.intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org, kan.liang@linux.intel.com, jmario@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, mingo@kernel.org, paulus@ozlabs.org, namhyung@kernel.org, mpetlan@redhat.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, mamatha4@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de List-Id: linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:53:31AM +0530, Kajol Jain wrote: SBIP > +static int metricgroup__add_metric_runtime_param(struct strbuf *events, > + struct list_head *group_list, struct pmu_event *pe) > +{ > + int i, count; > + int ret = -EINVAL; > + > + count = arch_get_runtimeparam(); > + > + /* This loop is added to create multiple > + * events depend on count value and add > + * those events to group_list. > + */ > + > + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { > + const char **ids; > + int idnum; > + struct egroup *eg; > + char value[PATH_MAX]; > + > + if (expr__find_other(pe->metric_expr, NULL, &ids, &idnum, i) < 0) > + return ret; > + > + if (events->len > 0) > + strbuf_addf(events, ","); > + > + if (metricgroup__has_constraint(pe)) > + metricgroup__add_metric_non_group(events, ids, idnum); > + else > + metricgroup__add_metric_weak_group(events, ids, idnum); > + > + eg = malloc(sizeof(*eg)); > + if (!eg) { > + ret = -ENOMEM; > + return ret; > + } > + > + sprintf(value, "%s%c%d", pe->metric_name, '_', i); > + eg->ids = ids; > + eg->idnum = idnum; > + eg->metric_name = strdup(value); > + if (!eg->metric_name) { > + ret = -ENOMEM; > + return ret; > + } > + > + eg->metric_expr = pe->metric_expr; > + eg->metric_unit = pe->unit; > + list_add_tail(&eg->nd, group_list); > + ret = 0; > + > + if (ret != 0) > + break; again, this is part of metricgroup__add_metric_param no? why not use it? jirka From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1675EC10F29 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 16:28:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBCE420714 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 16:28:10 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="boVVogPA" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org BBCE420714 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48hdrS1ggTzDqW1 for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 03:28:08 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com (client-ip=63.128.21.74; helo=us-smtp-delivery-74.mimecast.com; envelope-from=jolsa@redhat.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=boVVogPA; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from us-smtp-delivery-74.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-74.mimecast.com [63.128.21.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48hc8r35BkzDqRy for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 02:12:11 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1584457928; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=W5HQAvbPU4U3uMqTwVbtXlufV8kjT1jXd8mJ+pSamK4=; b=boVVogPAQ8J6KFMSEaEnFv/coxjncoAXIRY1ttyyEEcFTn/YYjmB+3eE4Xb0bigyEqxynE rDbsBtzB0MaX2BlJG0FNOWZNln/WhnO4HrvPrSnbL9a8ptXr1NB/c++9prRUhVWdi013Nv +bRnNwPuGNZ451ZEH51nQOOE3pyq/T0= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-479-kEnLFVR7PCuI3hiVy5LX1g-1; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 11:11:00 -0400 X-MC-Unique: kEnLFVR7PCuI3hiVy5LX1g-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4D28107ACC4; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 15:10:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krava (unknown [10.40.195.82]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BE4073865; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 15:10:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 16:10:47 +0100 From: Jiri Olsa To: Kajol Jain Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/11] perf/tools: Enhance JSON/metric infrastructure to handle "?" Message-ID: <20200317151047.GF757893@krava> References: <20200317062333.14555-1-kjain@linux.ibm.com> <20200317062333.14555-10-kjain@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200317062333.14555-10-kjain@linux.ibm.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org, yao.jin@linux.intel.com, mingo@kernel.org, kan.liang@linux.intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mamatha4@linux.vnet.ibm.com, sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com, acme@kernel.org, jmario@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, mpetlan@redhat.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:53:31AM +0530, Kajol Jain wrote: SBIP > +static int metricgroup__add_metric_runtime_param(struct strbuf *events, > + struct list_head *group_list, struct pmu_event *pe) > +{ > + int i, count; > + int ret = -EINVAL; > + > + count = arch_get_runtimeparam(); > + > + /* This loop is added to create multiple > + * events depend on count value and add > + * those events to group_list. > + */ > + > + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { > + const char **ids; > + int idnum; > + struct egroup *eg; > + char value[PATH_MAX]; > + > + if (expr__find_other(pe->metric_expr, NULL, &ids, &idnum, i) < 0) > + return ret; > + > + if (events->len > 0) > + strbuf_addf(events, ","); > + > + if (metricgroup__has_constraint(pe)) > + metricgroup__add_metric_non_group(events, ids, idnum); > + else > + metricgroup__add_metric_weak_group(events, ids, idnum); > + > + eg = malloc(sizeof(*eg)); > + if (!eg) { > + ret = -ENOMEM; > + return ret; > + } > + > + sprintf(value, "%s%c%d", pe->metric_name, '_', i); > + eg->ids = ids; > + eg->idnum = idnum; > + eg->metric_name = strdup(value); > + if (!eg->metric_name) { > + ret = -ENOMEM; > + return ret; > + } > + > + eg->metric_expr = pe->metric_expr; > + eg->metric_unit = pe->unit; > + list_add_tail(&eg->nd, group_list); > + ret = 0; > + > + if (ret != 0) > + break; again, this is part of metricgroup__add_metric_param no? why not use it? jirka