All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@gmail.com>
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, paolo.valente@linaro.org,
	ulf.hansson@linaro.org, adrian.hunter@intel.com, arnd@arndb.de,
	linus.walleij@linaro.org, orsonzhai@gmail.com,
	zhang.lyra@gmail.com, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND RFC PATCH 2/8] block: Allow sending a batch of requests from the scheduler to hardware
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 18:01:23 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200318100123.GA27531@ming.t460p> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c2e62e5a9942fb833dfc0cdc8c967a12f3c34b03.1584350380.git.baolin.wang7@gmail.com>

On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 06:01:19PM +0800, Baolin Wang wrote:
> As we know, some SD/MMC host controllers can support packed request,
> that means we can package several requests to host controller at one
> time to improve performence. So the hardware driver expects the blk-mq
> can dispatch a batch of requests at one time, and driver can use bd.last
> to indicate if it is the last request in the batch to help to combine
> requests as much as possible.
> 
> Thus we should add batch requests setting from the block driver to tell
> the scheduler how many requests can be dispatched in a batch, as well
> as changing the scheduler to dispatch more than one request if setting
> the maximum batch requests number.
> 

I feel this batch dispatch style is more complicated, and some other
drivers(virtio blk/scsi) still may get benefit if we can pass real 'last' flag in
.queue_rq().

So what about the following way by extending .commit_rqs() to this usage?
And you can do whatever batch processing in .commit_rqs() which will be
guaranteed to be called if BLK_MQ_F_FORCE_COMMIT_RQS is set by driver.

diff --git a/block/blk-mq-sched.c b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
index 856356b1619e..cd2bbe56f83f 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq-sched.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq-sched.c
@@ -85,11 +85,12 @@ void blk_mq_sched_restart(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
  * its queue by itself in its completion handler, so we don't need to
  * restart queue if .get_budget() returns BLK_STS_NO_RESOURCE.
  */
-static void blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
+static bool blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
 {
 	struct request_queue *q = hctx->queue;
 	struct elevator_queue *e = q->elevator;
 	LIST_HEAD(rq_list);
+	bool ret = false;
 
 	do {
 		struct request *rq;
@@ -112,7 +113,10 @@ static void blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
 		 * in blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list().
 		 */
 		list_add(&rq->queuelist, &rq_list);
-	} while (blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list, true));
+		ret = blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list, true);
+	} while (ret);
+
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static struct blk_mq_ctx *blk_mq_next_ctx(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
@@ -131,11 +135,12 @@ static struct blk_mq_ctx *blk_mq_next_ctx(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
  * its queue by itself in its completion handler, so we don't need to
  * restart queue if .get_budget() returns BLK_STS_NO_RESOURCE.
  */
-static void blk_mq_do_dispatch_ctx(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
+static bool blk_mq_do_dispatch_ctx(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
 {
 	struct request_queue *q = hctx->queue;
 	LIST_HEAD(rq_list);
 	struct blk_mq_ctx *ctx = READ_ONCE(hctx->dispatch_from);
+	bool ret = false;
 
 	do {
 		struct request *rq;
@@ -161,10 +166,12 @@ static void blk_mq_do_dispatch_ctx(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
 
 		/* round robin for fair dispatch */
 		ctx = blk_mq_next_ctx(hctx, rq->mq_ctx);
-
-	} while (blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list, true));
+		ret = blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list, true);
+	} while (ret);
 
 	WRITE_ONCE(hctx->dispatch_from, ctx);
+
+	return ret;
 }
 
 void blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
@@ -173,6 +180,7 @@ void blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
 	struct elevator_queue *e = q->elevator;
 	const bool has_sched_dispatch = e && e->type->ops.dispatch_request;
 	LIST_HEAD(rq_list);
+	bool dispatch_ret;
 
 	/* RCU or SRCU read lock is needed before checking quiesced flag */
 	if (unlikely(blk_mq_hctx_stopped(hctx) || blk_queue_quiesced(q)))
@@ -206,20 +214,26 @@ void blk_mq_sched_dispatch_requests(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx)
 	 */
 	if (!list_empty(&rq_list)) {
 		blk_mq_sched_mark_restart_hctx(hctx);
-		if (blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list, false)) {
+		dispatch_ret = blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list, false);
+		if (dispatch_ret) {
 			if (has_sched_dispatch)
-				blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(hctx);
+				dispatch_ret = blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(hctx);
 			else
-				blk_mq_do_dispatch_ctx(hctx);
+				dispatch_ret = blk_mq_do_dispatch_ctx(hctx);
 		}
 	} else if (has_sched_dispatch) {
-		blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(hctx);
+		dispatch_ret = blk_mq_do_dispatch_sched(hctx);
 	} else if (hctx->dispatch_busy) {
 		/* dequeue request one by one from sw queue if queue is busy */
-		blk_mq_do_dispatch_ctx(hctx);
+		dispatch_ret = blk_mq_do_dispatch_ctx(hctx);
 	} else {
 		blk_mq_flush_busy_ctxs(hctx, &rq_list);
-		blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list, false);
+		dispatch_ret = blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(q, &rq_list, false);
+	}
+
+	if (dispatch_ret) {
+		if (hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_FORCE_COMMIT_RQS)
+			hctx->queue->mq_ops->commit_rqs(hctx);
 	}
 }
 
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index 87c6699f35ae..9b46f5d6c7fd 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1238,11 +1238,15 @@ bool blk_mq_dispatch_rq_list(struct request_queue *q, struct list_head *list,
 		 * Flag last if we have no more requests, or if we have more
 		 * but can't assign a driver tag to it.
 		 */
-		if (list_empty(list))
-			bd.last = true;
-		else {
-			nxt = list_first_entry(list, struct request, queuelist);
-			bd.last = !blk_mq_get_driver_tag(nxt);
+		if (!(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_FORCE_COMMIT_RQS)) {
+			if (list_empty(list))
+				bd.last = true;
+			else {
+				nxt = list_first_entry(list, struct request, queuelist);
+				bd.last = !blk_mq_get_driver_tag(nxt);
+			}
+		} else {
+			bd.last = false;
 		}
 
 		ret = q->mq_ops->queue_rq(hctx, &bd);
diff --git a/include/linux/blk-mq.h b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
index 07fa767bff86..c0ef6990b698 100644
--- a/include/linux/blk-mq.h
+++ b/include/linux/blk-mq.h
@@ -394,6 +394,7 @@ enum {
 	BLK_MQ_F_SHOULD_MERGE	= 1 << 0,
 	BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED	= 1 << 1,
 	BLK_MQ_F_NO_MANAGED_IRQ	= 1 << 2,
+	BLK_MQ_F_FORCE_COMMIT_RQS = 1 << 3,
 	BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING	= 1 << 5,
 	BLK_MQ_F_NO_SCHED	= 1 << 6,
 	BLK_MQ_F_ALLOC_POLICY_START_BIT = 8,

Thanks, 
Ming


  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-18 10:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-16 10:01 [RESEND RFC PATCH 0/8] Add MMC packed request support Baolin Wang
2020-03-16 10:01 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH 1/8] block: Change the dispatch_request() API to support batch requests Baolin Wang
2020-03-16 10:01 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH 2/8] block: Allow sending a batch of requests from the scheduler to hardware Baolin Wang
2020-03-18 10:01   ` Ming Lei [this message]
2020-03-18 10:26     ` Baolin Wang
2020-03-20 10:27       ` Baolin Wang
2020-03-23  3:44         ` Ming Lei
2020-03-23  5:36           ` Baolin Wang
2020-03-23  7:26             ` Ming Lei
2020-03-23  8:22               ` Baolin Wang
2020-03-23  8:28                 ` Ming Lei
2020-03-23  9:13                   ` Baolin Wang
2020-03-23  9:58                     ` Ming Lei
2020-03-24  8:29                       ` Baolin Wang
2020-03-27  8:30                         ` Baolin Wang
2020-04-22  9:21                           ` Baolin Wang
2020-04-22  9:25                             ` Ming Lei
2020-04-22  9:28                               ` Baolin Wang
2020-03-16 10:01 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH 3/8] mmc: Add MMC packed request support for MMC software queue Baolin Wang
2020-03-16 10:01 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH 4/8] mmc: host: sdhci: Introduce ADMA3 transfer mode Baolin Wang
2020-03-16 10:01 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH 5/8] mmc: host: sdhci: Factor out the command configuration Baolin Wang
2020-03-16 10:01 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH 6/8] mmc: host: sdhci: Remove redundant sg_count member of struct sdhci_host Baolin Wang
2020-03-16 10:01 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH 7/8] mmc: host: sdhci: Add MMC packed request support Baolin Wang
2020-03-16 10:01 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH 8/8] mmc: host: sdhci-sprd: " Baolin Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200318100123.GA27531@ming.t460p \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=baolin.wang7@gmail.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=orsonzhai@gmail.com \
    --cc=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=zhang.lyra@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.