From: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
To: Thierry Reding
<thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Jonathan Hunter
<jonathanh-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/2] memory: tegra20-emc: Poll EMC-CaR handshake instead of waiting for interrupt
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2020 22:36:47 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200319193648.8810-1-digetx@gmail.com> (raw)
The memory clock-rate change could be running on a non-boot CPU, while the
boot CPU handles the EMC interrupt. This introduces an unnecessary latency
since boot CPU should handle the interrupt and then notify the sibling CPU
about clock-rate change completion. In some rare cases boot CPU could be
in uninterruptible state for a significant time (like in a case of KASAN +
NFS root), it could get to the point that completion timeouts before boot
CPU gets a chance to handle interrupt. The solution is to get rid of the
completion and replace it with interrupt-status polling.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
---
drivers/memory/tegra/tegra20-emc.c | 28 +++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra20-emc.c b/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra20-emc.c
index f74dd417c874..60b048ae9982 100644
--- a/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra20-emc.c
+++ b/drivers/memory/tegra/tegra20-emc.c
@@ -7,11 +7,11 @@
#include <linux/clk.h>
#include <linux/clk/tegra.h>
-#include <linux/completion.h>
#include <linux/debugfs.h>
#include <linux/err.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/iopoll.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
@@ -144,7 +144,6 @@ struct emc_timing {
struct tegra_emc {
struct device *dev;
- struct completion clk_handshake_complete;
struct notifier_block clk_nb;
struct clk *clk;
void __iomem *regs;
@@ -162,17 +161,13 @@ struct tegra_emc {
static irqreturn_t tegra_emc_isr(int irq, void *data)
{
struct tegra_emc *emc = data;
- u32 intmask = EMC_REFRESH_OVERFLOW_INT | EMC_CLKCHANGE_COMPLETE_INT;
+ u32 intmask = EMC_REFRESH_OVERFLOW_INT;
u32 status;
status = readl_relaxed(emc->regs + EMC_INTSTATUS) & intmask;
if (!status)
return IRQ_NONE;
- /* notify about EMC-CAR handshake completion */
- if (status & EMC_CLKCHANGE_COMPLETE_INT)
- complete(&emc->clk_handshake_complete);
-
/* notify about HW problem */
if (status & EMC_REFRESH_OVERFLOW_INT)
dev_err_ratelimited(emc->dev,
@@ -224,14 +219,13 @@ static int emc_prepare_timing_change(struct tegra_emc *emc, unsigned long rate)
/* wait until programming has settled */
readl_relaxed(emc->regs + emc_timing_registers[i - 1]);
- reinit_completion(&emc->clk_handshake_complete);
-
return 0;
}
static int emc_complete_timing_change(struct tegra_emc *emc, bool flush)
{
- unsigned long timeout;
+ u32 val;
+ int err;
dev_dbg(emc->dev, "%s: flush %d\n", __func__, flush);
@@ -242,11 +236,12 @@ static int emc_complete_timing_change(struct tegra_emc *emc, bool flush)
return 0;
}
- timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(&emc->clk_handshake_complete,
- msecs_to_jiffies(100));
- if (timeout == 0) {
- dev_err(emc->dev, "EMC-CAR handshake failed\n");
- return -EIO;
+ err = readl_relaxed_poll_timeout_atomic(emc->regs + EMC_INTSTATUS, val,
+ val & EMC_CLKCHANGE_COMPLETE_INT,
+ 1, 100);
+ if (err) {
+ dev_err(emc->dev, "emc-car handshake timeout: %d\n", err);
+ return err;
}
return 0;
@@ -412,7 +407,7 @@ tegra_emc_find_node_by_ram_code(struct device *dev)
static int emc_setup_hw(struct tegra_emc *emc)
{
- u32 intmask = EMC_REFRESH_OVERFLOW_INT | EMC_CLKCHANGE_COMPLETE_INT;
+ u32 intmask = EMC_REFRESH_OVERFLOW_INT;
u32 emc_cfg, emc_dbg;
emc_cfg = readl_relaxed(emc->regs + EMC_CFG_2);
@@ -686,7 +681,6 @@ static int tegra_emc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return -ENOMEM;
}
- init_completion(&emc->clk_handshake_complete);
emc->clk_nb.notifier_call = tegra_emc_clk_change_notify;
emc->dev = &pdev->dev;
--
2.25.1
next reply other threads:[~2020-03-19 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-19 19:36 Dmitry Osipenko [this message]
[not found] ` <20200319193648.8810-1-digetx-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2020-03-19 19:36 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] memory: tegra30-emc: Poll EMC-CaR handshake instead of waiting for interrupt Dmitry Osipenko
[not found] ` <20200319193648.8810-2-digetx-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
2020-05-06 16:44 ` Thierry Reding
2020-05-06 16:43 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] memory: tegra20-emc: " Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200319193648.8810-1-digetx@gmail.com \
--to=digetx-re5jqeeqqe8avxtiumwx3w@public.gmane.org \
--cc=jonathanh-DDmLM1+adcrQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-tegra-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=thierry.reding-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.