From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEFF7C43331 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 14:00:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alsa0.perex.cz (alsa0.perex.cz [77.48.224.243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5759F205ED for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 14:00:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alsa-project.org header.i=@alsa-project.org header.b="DA0rZv5X" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 5759F205ED Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (alsa1.perex.cz [207.180.221.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa0.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6F9015F8; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 14:59:08 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa0.perex.cz A6F9015F8 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=alsa-project.org; s=default; t=1585058398; bh=ZAvLSHBXEV2HBDdeeAnDyiWcapdaJvrFxnl9T3KlXWM=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:Cc:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=DA0rZv5XCCscirV5QzuetJpUduwtmH8x6OcGt1Hl/xyjBuCe+Wd+Cq5SZpl64TUa2 2zXnxDjnjuLGDFYWB3WjFFYw73L4ZbzZonUCE7Isht7TcHkLMao94OSG5I8MNYfAD/ tidALHfIXFN5oorLf5WEaWPLRCbF+zlJnfkrPFJM= Received: from alsa1.perex.cz (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41ED1F801F8; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 14:59:08 +0100 (CET) Received: by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix, from userid 50401) id 2B6BBF801F9; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 14:59:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by alsa1.perex.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54D5DF800B9; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 14:59:01 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 alsa1.perex.cz 54D5DF800B9 IronPort-SDR: CKEDXakbNeFNlBm71CRyrXw6XtEjp/v6Cgk+cF5AIAQl1kAyw0wb0nyLZSwiEJCQxp2VwOpFup RlcPSTLovrjg== X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Mar 2020 06:58:59 -0700 IronPort-SDR: tXU4/sxlWmPcrZrwUSFMmX/J/JydvV7JxB410pVa3riYI3wgfcsE7N10eGoG41KgJWWYUV1+KU GLT6vLU1eK+Q== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.72,300,1580803200"; d="scan'208";a="446234727" Received: from gliakhov-mobl2.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO ubuntu) ([10.249.33.88]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 24 Mar 2020 06:58:57 -0700 Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 14:58:56 +0100 From: Guennadi Liakhovetski To: Mark Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ASoC: SOF: initialise work immediately Message-ID: <20200324135856.GA29623@ubuntu> References: <20200324122921.29582-1-guennadi.liakhovetski@linux.intel.com> <20200324133042.GB7039@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200324133042.GB7039@sirena.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Cc: Takashi Iwai , Liam Girdwood , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, Pierre-Louis Bossart , sound-open-firmware@alsa-project.org X-BeenThere: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: "Alsa-devel mailing list for ALSA developers - http://www.alsa-project.org" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: alsa-devel-bounces@alsa-project.org Sender: "Alsa-devel" Hi Mark, On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 01:30:42PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 01:29:19PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: > > Fix uninitialised work errors by moving initialisation to directly > > after allocation. > > > > Guennadi Liakhovetski (2): > > ASoC: SOF: (cosmetic) use for_each_pcm_streams() in sof_dai_load() > > ASoC: SOF: fix uninitialised "work" with VirtIO > > As documented in submitting-patches.rst please send patches to the > maintainers for the code you would like to change. The normal kernel > workflow is that people apply patches from their inboxes, if they aren't > copied they are likely to not see the patch at all and it is much more > difficult to apply patches. I know that different maintainers have different preferences. For example in the subsysteem, where I'd worked for about 10 years the maintainer preferred not to be CCed on patches, he preferred to pick up patches from his mailing list folders, or whatever arrangement his mail filters provided for. I learned already that in ALSA / ASoC it's usual to CC maintainers. But I wasn't sure whether that also holds for larger patch series. E.g. my main patch series now consists of 14 patches, so, I thought, that maybe you would rather not receive multiple copies of the entire seriees for each new version both directly in your inbox and in the mailing list folder. Or is it indeed your preference to always be CCed on all patches? I apologise for re-iterating a question, that probably had been addressed multiple times before, maybe it's worth documenting this somewhere on ALSA web? Thanks Guennadi