From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Ashish Kalra <Ashish.Kalra@amd.com>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] KVM: SVM: Move and split up svm.c
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:30:07 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200324183007.GA7798@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200324094154.32352-1-joro@8bytes.org>
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 10:41:50AM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is a patch-set agains kvm/queue which moves svm.c into its own
> subdirectory arch/x86/kvm/svm/ and splits moves parts of it into
> separate source files:
What are people's thoughts on using "arch/x86/kvm/{amd,intel}" instead of
"arch/x86/kvm/{svm,vmx}"? Maybe this won't be an issue for AMD/SVM, but on
the Intel/VMX side, there is stuff in the pipeline that makes using "vmx"
for the sub-directory quite awkward. I wasn't planning on proposing the
rename (from vmx->intel) until I could justify _why_, but perhaps it makes
sense to bundle all the pain of a reorganizing code into a single kernel
version?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-24 18:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-24 9:41 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: SVM: Move and split up svm.c Joerg Roedel
2020-03-24 9:41 ` [PATCH 1/4] kVM SVM: Move SVM related files to own sub-directory Joerg Roedel
2020-03-24 9:41 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: SVM: Move Nested SVM Implementation to nested.c Joerg Roedel
2020-03-24 19:02 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-03-25 12:32 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-24 9:41 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: SVM: Move AVIC code to separate file Joerg Roedel
2020-03-24 9:41 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: SVM: Move SEV " Joerg Roedel
2020-03-24 11:33 ` [PATCH 0/4] KVM: SVM: Move and split up svm.c Paolo Bonzini
2020-03-24 17:56 ` Ashish Kalra
2020-03-24 18:30 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2020-03-24 18:42 ` Jim Mattson
2020-03-24 18:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-25 13:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-03-25 12:31 ` Joerg Roedel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200324183007.GA7798@linux.intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=Ashish.Kalra@amd.com \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.