From: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, xfs <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: don't write a corrupt unmount record to force summary counter recalc
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 08:31:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200327123148.GA27785@bfoster> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200327011417.GF29339@magnolia>
On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 06:14:17PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> From: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
>
> In commit f467cad95f5e3, I added the ability to force a recalculation of
> the filesystem summary counters if they seemed incorrect. This was done
> (not entirely correctly) by tweaking the log code to write an unmount
> record without the UMOUNT_TRANS flag set. At next mount, the log
> recovery code will fail to find the unmount record and go into recovery,
> which triggers the recalculation.
>
> What actually gets written to the log is what ought to be an unmount
> record, but without any flags set to indicate what kind of record it
> actually is. This worked to trigger the recalculation, but we shouldn't
> write bogus log records when we could simply write nothing.
>
> Fixes: f467cad95f5e3 ("xfs: force summary counter recalc at next mount")
> Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
> fs/xfs/xfs_log.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> index 46108ca20d85..00fda2e8e738 100644
> --- a/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> +++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_log.c
> @@ -835,19 +835,6 @@ xlog_unmount_write(
> if (error)
> goto out_err;
>
> - /*
> - * If we think the summary counters are bad, clear the unmount header
> - * flag in the unmount record so that the summary counters will be
> - * recalculated during log recovery at next mount. Refer to
> - * xlog_check_unmount_rec for more details.
> - */
> - if (XFS_TEST_ERROR(xfs_fs_has_sickness(mp, XFS_SICK_FS_COUNTERS), mp,
> - XFS_ERRTAG_FORCE_SUMMARY_RECALC)) {
> - xfs_alert(mp, "%s: will fix summary counters at next mount",
> - __func__);
> - flags &= ~XLOG_UNMOUNT_TRANS;
> - }
> -
> error = xlog_write_unmount_record(log, tic, &lsn, flags);
> /*
> * At this point, we're umounting anyway, so there's no point in
> @@ -913,6 +900,20 @@ xfs_log_unmount_write(
>
> if (XLOG_FORCED_SHUTDOWN(log))
> return;
> +
> + /*
> + * If we think the summary counters are bad, avoid writing the unmount
> + * record to force log recovery at next mount, after which the summary
> + * counters will be recalculated. Refer to xlog_check_unmount_rec for
> + * more details.
> + */
> + if (XFS_TEST_ERROR(xfs_fs_has_sickness(mp, XFS_SICK_FS_COUNTERS), mp,
> + XFS_ERRTAG_FORCE_SUMMARY_RECALC)) {
> + xfs_alert(mp, "%s: will fix summary counters at next mount",
> + __func__);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> xfs_log_unmount_verify_iclog(log);
> xlog_unmount_write(log);
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-27 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-27 1:14 [PATCH] xfs: don't write a corrupt unmount record to force summary counter recalc Darrick J. Wong
2020-03-27 9:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-03-27 12:31 ` Brian Foster [this message]
2020-03-29 23:04 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200327123148.GA27785@bfoster \
--to=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=darrick.wong@oracle.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.