Re: linux-next: Tree for Mar 30 (vhost)

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 10:22:22AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 3/30/20 2:43 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > The merge window has opened, so please do not add any material for the
> > next release into your linux-next included trees/branches until after
> > the merge window closes.
> > 
> > Changes since 20200327:
> > 
> > The vhost tree gained a conflict against the kvm-arm tree.
> > 
> 
> (note: today's linux-next is on 5.6-rc7.)
> 
> on x86_64:
> 
> # CONFIG_EVENTFD is not set

Oh, this is Jason's Kconfig refactoring. Vhost must depend on eventfd
of course. I fixed the relevant commit up and pushed the new tree again.
Would appreciate a report on whether any problems are left.


> ../drivers/vhost/vhost.c: In function 'vhost_vring_ioctl':
> ../drivers/vhost/vhost.c:1577:33: error: implicit declaration of function 'eventfd_fget'; did you mean 'eventfd_signal'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>    eventfp = f.fd == -1 ? NULL : eventfd_fget(f.fd);
>                                  ^~~~~~~~~~~~
>                                  eventfd_signal
> ../drivers/vhost/vhost.c:1577:31: warning: pointer/integer type mismatch in conditional expression
>    eventfp = f.fd == -1 ? NULL : eventfd_fget(f.fd);
>                                ^
> 
> -- 
> ~Randy
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>