From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 1/9] vhost: refine vhost and vringh kconfig Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 10:18:03 -0400 Message-ID: <20200401101634-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> References: <20200326140125.19794-1-jasowang@redhat.com> <20200326140125.19794-2-jasowang@redhat.com> <41ee1f6a-3124-d44b-bf34-0f26604f9514@redhat.com> <4726da4c-11ec-3b6e-1218-6d6d365d5038@de.ibm.com> <39b96e3a-9f4e-6e1d-e988-8c4bcfb55879@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jason Wang Cc: Christian Borntraeger , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, jgg@mellanox.com, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, cunming.liang@intel.com, zhihong.wang@intel.com, rob.miller@broadcom.com, xiao.w.wang@intel.com, lingshan.zhu@intel.com, eperezma@redhat.com, lulu@redhat.com, parav@mellanox.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, stefanha@redhat.com, rdunlap@infradead.org, hch@infradead.org, aadam@redhat.com, jiri@mellanox.com, shahafs@mellanox.com, hanand@xilinx.com, mhabets@solarflare.com, gdawar@xilinx.com, saugatm@xilinx.com, vmireyno@marvell.com, zhangweining@ruijie.com.cn List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 10:13:29PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2020/4/1 下午9:02, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > > > On 01.04.20 14:56, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > > On 01.04.20 14:50, Jason Wang wrote: > > > > On 2020/4/1 下午7:21, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > > > > On 26.03.20 15:01, Jason Wang wrote: > > > > > > Currently, CONFIG_VHOST depends on CONFIG_VIRTUALIZATION. But vhost is > > > > > > not necessarily for VM since it's a generic userspace and kernel > > > > > > communication protocol. Such dependency may prevent archs without > > > > > > virtualization support from using vhost. > > > > > > > > > > > > To solve this, a dedicated vhost menu is created under drivers so > > > > > > CONIFG_VHOST can be decoupled out of CONFIG_VIRTUALIZATION. > > > > > FWIW, this now results in vhost not being build with defconfig kernels (in todays > > > > > linux-next). > > > > > > > > > Hi Christian: > > > > > > > > Did you meet it even with this commit https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/?id=a4be40cbcedba9b5b714f3c95182e8a45176e42d? > > > I simply used linux-next. The defconfig does NOT contain CONFIG_VHOST and therefore CONFIG_VHOST_NET and friends > > > can not be selected. > > > > > > $ git checkout next-20200401 > > > $ make defconfig > > > HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep > > > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/conf.o > > > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/confdata.o > > > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/expr.o > > > LEX scripts/kconfig/lexer.lex.c > > > YACC scripts/kconfig/parser.tab.[ch] > > > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/lexer.lex.o > > > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/parser.tab.o > > > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/preprocess.o > > > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/symbol.o > > > HOSTCC scripts/kconfig/util.o > > > HOSTLD scripts/kconfig/conf > > > *** Default configuration is based on 'x86_64_defconfig' > > > # > > > # configuration written to .config > > > # > > > > > > $ grep VHOST .config > > > # CONFIG_VHOST is not set > > > > > > > If yes, what's your build config looks like? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > This was x86. Not sure if that did work before. > > On s390 this is definitely a regression as the defconfig files > > for s390 do select VHOST_NET > > > > grep VHOST arch/s390/configs/* > > arch/s390/configs/debug_defconfig:CONFIG_VHOST_NET=m > > arch/s390/configs/debug_defconfig:CONFIG_VHOST_VSOCK=m > > arch/s390/configs/defconfig:CONFIG_VHOST_NET=m > > arch/s390/configs/defconfig:CONFIG_VHOST_VSOCK=m > > > > and this worked with 5.6, but does not work with next. Just adding > > CONFIG_VHOST=m to the defconfig solves the issue, something like > > > Right, I think we probably need > > 1) add CONFIG_VHOST=m to all defconfigs that enables > CONFIG_VHOST_NET/VSOCK/SCSI. > > or > > 2) don't use menuconfig for CONFIG_VHOST, let NET/SCSI/VDPA just select it. > > Thanks I think I prefer 2, but does it auto-select VHOST_IOTLB then? Generally what was the reason to drop select VHOST from devices? > > > > > --- > > arch/s390/configs/debug_defconfig | 5 +++-- > > arch/s390/configs/defconfig | 5 +++-- > > 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/s390/configs/debug_defconfig b/arch/s390/configs/debug_defconfig > > index 46038bc58c9e..0b83274341ce 100644 > > --- a/arch/s390/configs/debug_defconfig > > +++ b/arch/s390/configs/debug_defconfig > > @@ -57,8 +57,6 @@ CONFIG_PROTECTED_VIRTUALIZATION_GUEST=y > > CONFIG_CMM=m > > CONFIG_APPLDATA_BASE=y > > CONFIG_KVM=m > > -CONFIG_VHOST_NET=m > > -CONFIG_VHOST_VSOCK=m > > CONFIG_OPROFILE=m > > CONFIG_KPROBES=y > > CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL=y > > @@ -561,6 +559,9 @@ CONFIG_VFIO_MDEV_DEVICE=m > > CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI=m > > CONFIG_VIRTIO_BALLOON=m > > CONFIG_VIRTIO_INPUT=y > > +CONFIG_VHOST=m > > +CONFIG_VHOST_NET=m > > +CONFIG_VHOST_VSOCK=m > > CONFIG_S390_CCW_IOMMU=y > > CONFIG_S390_AP_IOMMU=y > > CONFIG_EXT4_FS=y > > diff --git a/arch/s390/configs/defconfig b/arch/s390/configs/defconfig > > index 7cd0648c1f4e..39e69c4e8cf7 100644 > > --- a/arch/s390/configs/defconfig > > +++ b/arch/s390/configs/defconfig > > @@ -57,8 +57,6 @@ CONFIG_PROTECTED_VIRTUALIZATION_GUEST=y > > CONFIG_CMM=m > > CONFIG_APPLDATA_BASE=y > > CONFIG_KVM=m > > -CONFIG_VHOST_NET=m > > -CONFIG_VHOST_VSOCK=m > > CONFIG_OPROFILE=m > > CONFIG_KPROBES=y > > CONFIG_JUMP_LABEL=y > > @@ -557,6 +555,9 @@ CONFIG_VFIO_MDEV_DEVICE=m > > CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI=m > > CONFIG_VIRTIO_BALLOON=m > > CONFIG_VIRTIO_INPUT=y > > +CONFIG_VHOST=m > > +CONFIG_VHOST_NET=m > > +CONFIG_VHOST_VSOCK=m > > CONFIG_S390_CCW_IOMMU=y > > CONFIG_S390_AP_IOMMU=y > > CONFIG_EXT4_FS=y