From: "SZEDER Gábor" <szeder.dev@gmail.com>
To: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, dstolee@microsoft.com, gitster@pobox.com,
martin.agren@gmail.com, peff@peff.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] builtin/commit-graph.c: support '--input=graphed'
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2020 00:49:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200401224912.GI2224@szeder.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e0f42a2f3c0162a5d43bb2bce0f69264b59f92e9.1584994172.git.me@ttaylorr.com>
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 02:12:19PM -0600, Taylor Blau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In response to some discussion in [1], here is another idea instead of
> '--input=none' that may make things a little clearer. Since it had been
> a long time, I reminded myself that '--input=none' means
> "--input=append, but don't look at packs as is usually the default".
>
> In [1], Gabor suggested that we could call this '--input=exists' or
> '--input=existing', but I think that 'graphed' may be clearer, since
> it is closer to "only _graphed_ commits".
>
> Another option would be to call this '--input=only-graphed', but I think
> that may be overly verbose for what we're going for here.
>
> Let me know what you think.
>
> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/20200322110424.GC2224@szeder.dev/
>
> --- 8< ---
>
> In the previous commit, we introduced '--split=<no-merge|merge-all>',
> and alluded to the fact that '--split=merge-all' would be useful for
> callers who wish to always trigger a merge of an incremental chain.
>
> There is a problem with the above approach, which is that there is no
> way to specify to the commit-graph builtin that a caller only wants to
> include commits already in the graph. One can specify '--input=append'
> to include all commits in the existing graphs, but the absence of
> '--input=stdin-{commits,packs}' causes the builtin to call
> 'fill_oids_from_all_packs()'.
>
> Passing '--input=reachable' (as in 'git commit-graph write
> --split=merge-all --input=reachable --input=append') works around this
> issue by making '--input=reachable' effectively a no-op, but this can be
> prohibitively expensive in large repositories, making it an undesirable
> choice for some users.
>
> Teach '--input=graphed' as an option to behave as if '--input=append' were
> given, but to consider no other sources in addition.
>
> This, in conjunction with the option introduced in the previous patch
> offers the convenient way to force the commit-graph machinery to
> condense a chain of incrementals without requiring any new commits:
>
> $ git commit-graph write --split=merge-all --input=graphed
>
> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
> ---
> Documentation/git-commit-graph.txt | 8 +++++++-
> builtin/commit-graph.c | 11 ++++++++---
> commit-graph.c | 6 ++++--
> commit-graph.h | 3 ++-
> t/t5324-split-commit-graph.sh | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-commit-graph.txt b/Documentation/git-commit-graph.txt
> index 0a320cccdd..4d8fbbe8ff 100644
> --- a/Documentation/git-commit-graph.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/git-commit-graph.txt
> @@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ COMMANDS
> --------
> 'write'::
>
> -Write a commit-graph file based on the commits found in packfiles.
> +Write a commit-graph file based on the specified sources of input:
> +
> With the `--input=stdin-packs` option, generate the new commit graph by
> walking objects only in the specified pack-indexes. (Cannot be combined
> @@ -57,6 +57,12 @@ walking commits starting at all refs. (Cannot be combined with
> With the `--input=append` option, include all commits that are present
> in the existing commit-graph file.
> +
> +With the `--input=graphed` option, behave as if `--input=append` were
> +given, but do not walk other packs to find additional commits.
s/walk/scan/ would be more fitting, I think.
In an earlier version of these patches I asked for clarification about
what happens with expired commits that are still included in the
commit-graph... and I do remember that you replied to that, but,
unfortunately, not what your reply was. And after reading this log
message and the documentation update it's still not clear to me.
> ++
> +If none of the above options are given, then generate the new
> +commit-graph by walking over all pack-indexes.
s/walking/scanning/
> ++
> With the `--split[=<strategy>]` option, write the commit-graph as a
> chain of multiple commit-graph files stored in
> `<dir>/info/commit-graphs`. Commit-graph layers are merged based on the
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-01 22:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4e85c6f7e40e7d6a8d93574645d65971b7cfa4f8.1581486293.git.me@ttaylorr.com/>
2020-03-03 23:27 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] builtin/commit-graph.c: support '--input=none' Taylor Blau
2020-03-23 20:12 ` [PATCH v4] builtin/commit-graph.c: support '--input=graphed' Taylor Blau
2020-03-27 9:13 ` Jeff King
2020-04-01 22:49 ` SZEDER Gábor [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200401224912.GI2224@szeder.dev \
--to=szeder.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=dstolee@microsoft.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=martin.agren@gmail.com \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.