From: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
To: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"K . Y . Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>,
linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org,
Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 03/11] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Replace the per-CPU channel lists with a global array of channels
Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 15:38:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200403133826.GA25401@andrea> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87imim2epp.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
On Mon, Mar 30, 2020 at 02:45:54PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com> writes:
>
> >> Correct me if I'm wrong, but currently vmbus_chan_sched() accesses
> >> per-cpu list of channels on the same CPU so we don't need a spinlock to
> >> guarantee that during an interrupt we'll be able to see the update if it
> >> happened before the interrupt (in chronological order). With a global
> >> list of relids, who guarantees that an interrupt handler on another CPU
> >> will actually see the modified list?
> >
> > Thanks for pointing this out!
> >
> > The offer/resume path presents implicit full memory barriers, program
> > -order after the array store which should guarantee the visibility of
> > the store to *all* CPUs before the offer/resume can complete (c.f.,
> >
> > tools/memory-model/Documentation/explanation.txt, Sect. #13
> >
> > and assuming that the offer/resume for a channel must complete before
> > the corresponding handler, which seems to be the case considered that
> > some essential channel fields are initialized only later...)
> >
> > IIUC, the spin lock approach you suggested will work and be "simpler";
> > an obvious side effect would be, well, a global synchronization point
> > in vmbus_chan_sched()...
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> This is, of course, very theoretical as if we're seeing an interrupt for
> a channel at the same time we're writing its relid we're already in
> trouble. I can, however, try to suggest one tiny improvement:
Indeed. I think the idea (still quite informal) is that:
1) the mapping of the channel relid is propagated to (visible from)
all CPUs before add_channel_work is queued (full barrier in
queue_work()),
2) add_channel_work is queued before the channel is opened (aka,
before the channel ring buffer is allocate/initalized and the
OPENCHANNEL msg is sent and acked from Hyper-V, cf. OPEN_STATE),
3) the channel is opened before Hyper-V can start sending interrupts
for the channel, and hence before vmbus_chan_sched() can find the
channel relid in recv_int_page set,
4) vmbus_chan_sched() finds the channel's relid in recv_int_page
set before it search/load from the channel array (full barrier
in sync_test_and_clear_bit()).
This is for the "normal"/not resuming from hibernation case; for the
latter, notice that:
a) vmbus_isr() (and vmbus_chan_sched()) can not run until when
vmbus_bus_resume() has finished (@resume_noirq callback),
b) vmbus_bus_resume() can not complete before nr_chan_fixup_on_resume
equals 0 in check_ready_for_resume_event().
(and check_ready_for_resume_event() does also provides a full barrier).
If makes sense to you, I'll try to add some of the above in comments.
Thanks,
Andrea
>
> vmbus_chan_sched() now clean the bit in the event page and then searches
> for a channel with this relid; in case we allow the search to
> (temporary) fail we can reverse the logic: search for the channel and
> clean the bit only if we succeed. In case we fail, next time (next IRQ)
> we'll try again and likely succeed. The only purpose is to make sure no
> interrupts are ever lost. This may be an overkill, we may want to try
> to count how many times (if ever) this happens.
>
> Just a thought though.
>
> --
> Vitaly
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-03 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-25 22:54 [RFC PATCH 00/11] VMBus channel interrupt reassignment Andrea Parri (Microsoft)
2020-03-25 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH 01/11] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Always handle the VMBus messages on CPU0 Andrea Parri (Microsoft)
2020-03-26 14:05 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-03-28 18:50 ` Andrea Parri
2020-03-25 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH 02/11] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Don't bind the offer&rescind works to a specific CPU Andrea Parri (Microsoft)
2020-03-26 14:16 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-03-26 15:47 ` Andrea Parri
2020-03-26 17:26 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-03-28 17:08 ` Andrea Parri
2020-03-29 3:43 ` Michael Kelley
2020-03-30 12:24 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-04-03 12:04 ` Andrea Parri
2020-03-25 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH 03/11] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Replace the per-CPU channel lists with a global array of channels Andrea Parri (Microsoft)
2020-03-26 14:31 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-03-26 17:05 ` Andrea Parri
2020-03-26 17:43 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-03-28 18:21 ` Andrea Parri
2020-03-29 3:49 ` Michael Kelley
2020-03-30 12:45 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-04-03 13:38 ` Andrea Parri [this message]
2020-04-03 14:56 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-03-25 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH 04/11] hv_netvsc: Disable NAPI before closing the VMBus channel Andrea Parri (Microsoft)
2020-03-26 15:26 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-03-26 17:55 ` Andrea Parri
2020-03-25 22:54 ` [RFC PATCH 05/11] hv_utils: Always execute the fcopy and vss callbacks in a tasklet Andrea Parri (Microsoft)
2020-03-25 22:55 ` [RFC PATCH 06/11] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Use a spin lock for synchronizing channel scheduling vs. channel removal Andrea Parri (Microsoft)
2020-03-25 22:55 ` [RFC PATCH 07/11] PCI: hv: Prepare hv_compose_msi_msg() for the VMBus-channel-interrupt-to-vCPU reassignment functionality Andrea Parri (Microsoft)
2020-03-25 22:55 ` [RFC PATCH 08/11] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Remove the unused HV_LOCALIZED channel affinity logic Andrea Parri (Microsoft)
2020-03-25 22:55 ` [RFC PATCH 09/11] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Synchronize init_vp_index() vs. CPU hotplug Andrea Parri (Microsoft)
2020-03-25 22:55 ` [RFC PATCH 10/11] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Introduce the CHANNELMSG_MODIFYCHANNEL message type Andrea Parri (Microsoft)
2020-03-26 14:46 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-03-28 18:48 ` Andrea Parri
2020-04-03 14:55 ` Andrea Parri
2020-03-25 22:55 ` [RFC PATCH 11/11] scsi: storvsc: Re-init stor_chns when a channel interrupt is re-assigned Andrea Parri (Microsoft)
2020-03-30 16:42 ` Michael Kelley
2020-03-30 18:55 ` Andrea Parri
2020-03-30 19:49 ` Michael Kelley
2020-04-03 13:41 ` Andrea Parri
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200403133826.GA25401@andrea \
--to=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikelley@microsoft.com \
--cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.