From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
To: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl>,
linux-media@vger.kernel.org, libcamera-devel@lists.libcamera.org,
mchehab@kernel.org, sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com,
andrey.konovalov@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [v2 2/3] Documentation: media: Document read-only subdevice
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 15:39:35 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200406123935.GA14971@pendragon.ideasonboard.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200406110732.cfxepbhllle6vsrw@uno.localdomain>
Hi Jacopo,
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 01:07:32PM +0200, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 at 04:35:45AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 01:54:13PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >> On 4/1/20 1:46 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 01:19:00PM +0200, Hans Verkuil wrote:
> >>>> On 3/27/20 11:35 PM, Jacopo Mondi wrote:
> >>>>> Document a new kapi function to register subdev device nodes in read only
> >>>>
> >>>> kAPI
> >>>>
> >>>>> mode and for each affected ioctl report how access is restricted.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Jacopo Mondi <jacopo@jmondi.org>
> >>>>> ---
> >>>>> Documentation/media/kapi/v4l2-subdev.rst | 44 +++++++++++++++++++
> >>>>> Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/dev-subdev.rst | 5 +++
> >>>>> .../media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-g-dv-timings.rst | 6 +++
> >>>>> Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-g-std.rst | 6 +++
> >>>>> .../media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-subdev-g-crop.rst | 9 ++++
> >>>>> .../media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-subdev-g-fmt.rst | 8 ++++
> >>>>> .../v4l/vidioc-subdev-g-frame-interval.rst | 8 ++++
> >>>>> .../uapi/v4l/vidioc-subdev-g-selection.rst | 8 ++++
> >>>>> 8 files changed, 94 insertions(+)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/media/kapi/v4l2-subdev.rst b/Documentation/media/kapi/v4l2-subdev.rst
> >>>>> index 41ccb3e5c707..6506a673e6a1 100644
> >>>>> --- a/Documentation/media/kapi/v4l2-subdev.rst
> >>>>> +++ b/Documentation/media/kapi/v4l2-subdev.rst
> >>>>> @@ -332,6 +332,50 @@ Private ioctls
> >>>>> All ioctls not in the above list are passed directly to the sub-device
> >>>>> driver through the core::ioctl operation.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +Read-only sub-device userspace API
> >>>>> +----------------------------------
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +Bridge drivers that control their connected subdevices through direct calls to
> >>>>> +the kernel API realized by :c:type:`v4l2_subdev_ops` structure do not usually
> >>>>> +want userspace to be able to change the same parameters through the subdevice
> >>>>> +device node and thus do not usually register any.
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +It is sometimes useful to report to userspace the current subdevice
> >>>>> +configuration through a read-only API, that does not permit applications to
> >>>>> +change to the device parameters but allows interfacing to the subdevice device
> >>>>> +node to inspect them.
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +For instance, to implement cameras based on computational photography, userspace
> >>>>> +needs to know the detailed camera sensor configuration (in terms of skipping,
> >>>>> +binning, cropping and scaling) for each supported output resolution. To support
> >>>>> +such use cases, bridge drivers may expose the subdevice operations to userspace
> >>>>> +through a read-only API.
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +To create a read-only device node for all the subdevices registered with the
> >>>>> +``V4L2_SUBDEV_FL_HAS_DEVNODE`` set, the :c:type:`v4l2_device` driver should call
> >>>>> +:c:func:`v4l2_device_register_ro_subdev_nodes`.
> >>>>
> >>>> Should we add something about creating a /dev/media device as well? It's basically
> >>>> required for this functionality.
> >>>
> >>> I'm not opposed to that, but I don't think this should be specific to
> >>> the read-only API, as it's a shared requirement with thr R/W API. The
> >>> previous section, "V4L2 sub-device userspace API", doesn't mention media
> >>> devices.
> >>
> >> True.
> >>
> >>>> I think it might be a good idea to put v4l2_device_register_ro_subdev_nodes()
> >>>> under #ifdef CONFIG_MEDIA_CONTROLLER so that this config *has* to be set in order
> >>>> to be able to call this function. Or possibly have an explicit test in
> >>>> __v4l2_device_register_subdev_nodes for the presence of a media device if
> >>>> read_only is true.
> >>>
> >>> VIDEO_V4L2_SUBDEV_API depends on MEDIA_CONTROLLER, but only part of that
> >>> actually depends on MEDIA_CONTROLLER in the code. I'd vote to simplify
> >>> this and make MEDIA_CONTROLLER a requirement for any userspace access
> >>> from userspace.
> >>
> >> I agree.
> >
> > Does that mean we should rework it as a prerequisite for this series, as
> > part of the series, or separately ?
>
> I would, for the moment, make v4l2_device_register_ro_subdev_nodes and
> v4l2_device_register_subdev_nodes dependendent on
> VIDEO_V4L2_SUBDEV_API, so that they're only available to drivers
> actually wanting userspace access. Then when moving everything to
> MEDIA_CONTROLLER, they can be moved to.
>
> However, this is not clear to me
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-subdev.c#L338
>
> What is the reason to have some of the subdev ioctls protected by
> VIDEO_V4L2_SUBDEV_API, while the v4l2-control related ones are not ?
I'd say historical mistake :-) I think we can move everything under
VIDEO_V4L2_SUBDEV_API.
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +Access to the following ioctls for userspace applications is restricted on
> >>>>> +sub-device device nodes registered with
> >>>>> +:c:func:`v4l2_device_register_ro_subdev_nodes`.
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +``VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_FMT``,
> >>>>> +``VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_CROP``,
> >>>>> +``VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_SELECTION``:
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + These ioctls are only allowed on a read-only subdevice device node
> >>>>> + for the :ref:`V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_TRY <v4l2-subdev-format-whence>`
> >>>>> + formats and selection rectangles.
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +``VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_FRAME_INTERVAL``,
> >>>>> +``VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_DV_TIMINGS``,
> >>>>> +``VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_STD``:
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> + These ioctls are not allowed on a read-only subdevice node.
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +In case the ioclt is not allowed, or the format to modify is set to
> >>>>> +``V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_ACTIVE``, the core returns a negative error code and
> >>>>> +the errno variable is set to ``-EPERM``.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I2C sub-device drivers
> >>>>> ----------------------
> >>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/dev-subdev.rst b/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/dev-subdev.rst
> >>>>> index 029bb2d9928a..6082f9c2f8f4 100644
> >>>>> --- a/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/dev-subdev.rst
> >>>>> +++ b/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/dev-subdev.rst
> >>>>> @@ -39,6 +39,11 @@ will feature a character device node on which ioctls can be called to
> >>>>> Sub-device character device nodes, conventionally named
> >>>>> ``/dev/v4l-subdev*``, use major number 81.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +Drivers may opt to limit the sub-device character devices to only expose
> >>>>> +operations that don't modify the device state. In such a case the sub-devices
> >>>>
> >>>> don't -> do not
> >>>>
> >>>> ("don't" is a bit too informal)
> >>>>
> >>>>> +are referred to as ``read-only`` in the rest of this documentation, and the
> >>>>> +related restrictions are documented in individual ioctls.
> >>>>> +
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Controls
> >>>>> ========
> >>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-g-dv-timings.rst b/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-g-dv-timings.rst
> >>>>> index e36dd2622857..611f94e4510a 100644
> >>>>> --- a/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-g-dv-timings.rst
> >>>>> +++ b/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-g-dv-timings.rst
> >>>>> @@ -57,6 +57,10 @@ pointer to the struct :c:type:`v4l2_dv_timings`
> >>>>> structure as argument. If the ioctl is not supported or the timing
> >>>>> values are not correct, the driver returns ``EINVAL`` error code.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +Calling ``VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_DV_TIMINGS`` on a subdev device node that has been
> >>>>> +registered in read-only mode is not allowed. An error is returned and the errno
> >>>>> +variable is set to ``-EPERM``.
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> The ``linux/v4l2-dv-timings.h`` header can be used to get the timings of
> >>>>> the formats in the :ref:`cea861` and :ref:`vesadmt` standards. If
> >>>>> the current input or output does not support DV timings (e.g. if
> >>>>> @@ -81,6 +85,8 @@ ENODATA
> >>>>> EBUSY
> >>>>> The device is busy and therefore can not change the timings.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +EPERM
> >>>>> + ``VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_DV_TIMINGS`` has been called on a read-only subdevice.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> .. tabularcolumns:: |p{4.4cm}|p{4.4cm}|p{8.7cm}|
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-g-std.rst b/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-g-std.rst
> >>>>> index e633e42e3910..e220b38b859f 100644
> >>>>> --- a/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-g-std.rst
> >>>>> +++ b/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-g-std.rst
> >>>>> @@ -66,6 +66,9 @@ video timings (e.g. if :ref:`VIDIOC_ENUMINPUT`
> >>>>> does not set the ``V4L2_IN_CAP_STD`` flag), then ``ENODATA`` error code is
> >>>>> returned.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +Calling ``VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_STD`` on a subdev device node that has been registered
> >>>>> +in read-only mode is not allowed. An error is returned and the errno variable is
> >>>>> +set to ``-EPERM``.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Return Value
> >>>>> ============
> >>>>> @@ -79,3 +82,6 @@ EINVAL
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ENODATA
> >>>>> Standard video timings are not supported for this input or output.
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +EPERM
> >>>>> + ``VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_STD`` has been called on a read-only subdevice.
> >>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-subdev-g-crop.rst b/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-subdev-g-crop.rst
> >>>>> index 632ee053accc..62f5d9870ca7 100644
> >>>>> --- a/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-subdev-g-crop.rst
> >>>>> +++ b/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-subdev-g-crop.rst
> >>>>> @@ -73,6 +73,11 @@ crop rectangles and stored in the sub-device file handle. Two
> >>>>> applications querying the same sub-device would thus not interact with
> >>>>> each other.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +If the subdev device node has been registered in read-only mode calls to
> >>>>
> >>>> mode calls -> mode, calls
> >>>>
> >>>>> +``VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_CROP`` are only valid if the ``which`` field is set to
> >>>>> +``V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_TRY``, otherwise an error is returned and the errno
> >>>>> +variable is set to ``-EPERM``.
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> Drivers must not return an error solely because the requested crop
> >>>>> rectangle doesn't match the device capabilities. They must instead
> >>>>> modify the rectangle to match what the hardware can provide. The
> >>>>> @@ -123,3 +128,7 @@ EINVAL
> >>>>> references a non-existing pad, the ``which`` field references a
> >>>>> non-existing format, or cropping is not supported on the given
> >>>>> subdev pad.
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +EPERM
> >>>>> + The ``VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_CROP`` ioctl has been called on a read-only subdevice
> >>>>> + and the ``which`` field is set to ``V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_ACTIVE``.
> >>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-subdev-g-fmt.rst b/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-subdev-g-fmt.rst
> >>>>> index 472577bd1745..3a2f64bb00e7 100644
> >>>>> --- a/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-subdev-g-fmt.rst
> >>>>> +++ b/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-subdev-g-fmt.rst
> >>>>> @@ -78,6 +78,11 @@ current links configuration or sub-device controls value. For instance,
> >>>>> a low-pass noise filter might crop pixels at the frame boundaries,
> >>>>> modifying its output frame size.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +If the subdev device node has been registered in read-only mode calls to
> >>>>
> >>>> ditto.
> >>>>
> >>>>> +``VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_FMT`` are only valid if the ``which`` field is set to
> >>>>> +``V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_TRY``, otherwise an error is returned and the errno
> >>>>> +variable is set to ``-EPERM``.
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> Drivers must not return an error solely because the requested format
> >>>>> doesn't match the device capabilities. They must instead modify the
> >>>>> format to match what the hardware can provide. The modified format
> >>>>> @@ -146,6 +151,9 @@ EINVAL
> >>>>> ``pad`` references a non-existing pad, or the ``which`` field
> >>>>> references a non-existing format.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +EPERM
> >>>>> + The ``VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_FMT`` ioctl has been called on a read-only subdevice
> >>>>> + and the ``which`` field is set to ``V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_ACTIVE``.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ============
> >>>>>
> >>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-subdev-g-frame-interval.rst b/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-subdev-g-frame-interval.rst
> >>>>> index 4b1b4bc78bfe..34aa39096e3d 100644
> >>>>> --- a/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-subdev-g-frame-interval.rst
> >>>>> +++ b/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-subdev-g-frame-interval.rst
> >>>>> @@ -65,6 +65,10 @@ struct
> >>>>> contains the current frame interval as would be returned by a
> >>>>> ``VIDIOC_SUBDEV_G_FRAME_INTERVAL`` call.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +Calling ``VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_FRAME_INTERVAL`` on a subdev device node that has been
> >>>>> +registered in read-only mode is not allowed. An error is returned and the errno
> >>>>> +variable is set to ``-EPERM``.
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> Drivers must not return an error solely because the requested interval
> >>>>> doesn't match the device capabilities. They must instead modify the
> >>>>> interval to match what the hardware can provide. The modified interval
> >>>>> @@ -118,3 +122,7 @@ EINVAL
> >>>>> :c:type:`v4l2_subdev_frame_interval`
> >>>>> ``pad`` references a non-existing pad, or the pad doesn't support
> >>>>> frame intervals.
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +EPERM
> >>>>> + The ``VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_FRAME_INTERVAL`` ioctl has been called on a read-only
> >>>>> + subdevice.
> >>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-subdev-g-selection.rst b/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-subdev-g-selection.rst
> >>>>> index fc73d27e6d74..abd046cef612 100644
> >>>>> --- a/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-subdev-g-selection.rst
> >>>>> +++ b/Documentation/media/uapi/v4l/vidioc-subdev-g-selection.rst
> >>>>> @@ -53,6 +53,10 @@ function of the crop API, and more, are supported by the selections API.
> >>>>> See :ref:`subdev` for more information on how each selection target
> >>>>> affects the image processing pipeline inside the subdevice.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> +If the subdev device node has been registered in read-only mode calls to
> >>>>
> >>>> ditto
> >>>>
> >>>>> +``VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_SELECTION`` are only valid if the ``which`` field is set to
> >>>>> +``V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_TRY``, otherwise an error is returned and the errno
> >>>>> +variable is set to ``-EPERM``.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Types of selection targets
> >>>>> --------------------------
> >>>>> @@ -123,3 +127,7 @@ EINVAL
> >>>>> ``pad`` references a non-existing pad, the ``which`` field
> >>>>> references a non-existing format, or the selection target is not
> >>>>> supported on the given subdev pad.
> >>>>> +
> >>>>> +EPERM
> >>>>> + The ``VIDIOC_SUBDEV_S_SELECTION`` ioctl has been called on a read-only
> >>>>> + subdevice and the ``which`` field is set to ``V4L2_SUBDEV_FORMAT_ACTIVE``.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-06 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-27 22:35 [v3 0/3] media: Register read-only sub-dev devnode Jacopo Mondi
2020-03-27 22:35 ` [v2 1/3] Documentation: media: Update sub-device API intro Jacopo Mondi
2020-03-27 22:35 ` [v2 2/3] Documentation: media: Document read-only subdevice Jacopo Mondi
2020-03-27 23:33 ` Sakari Ailus
2020-04-01 22:10 ` Jacopo Mondi
2020-04-06 7:00 ` Sakari Ailus
2020-04-01 11:19 ` Hans Verkuil
2020-04-01 11:46 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-04-01 11:54 ` Hans Verkuil
2020-04-01 12:39 ` Jacopo Mondi
2020-04-04 1:35 ` Laurent Pinchart
2020-04-06 11:07 ` Jacopo Mondi
2020-04-06 12:39 ` Laurent Pinchart [this message]
2020-04-06 12:47 ` Jacopo Mondi
2020-03-27 22:35 ` [v2 3/3] media: v4l2-dev: Add v4l2_device_register_ro_subdev_node() Jacopo Mondi
2020-04-01 11:28 ` Hans Verkuil
2020-04-01 12:26 ` Jacopo Mondi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200406123935.GA14971@pendragon.ideasonboard.com \
--to=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=andrey.konovalov@linaro.org \
--cc=hverkuil-cisco@xs4all.nl \
--cc=jacopo@jmondi.org \
--cc=libcamera-devel@lists.libcamera.org \
--cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.