Re: [PATCH 01/15] run-job: create barebones builtin

[Danh Doan <congdanhqx@gmail.com>]

On 2020-04-07 06:54:33-0400, Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 4/6/2020 8:58 PM, Danh Doan wrote:
> > On 2020-04-06 10:42:23-0400, Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Of course, not every platform has "cron" but that just means we need a
> >> cross-platform way to launch Git processes on some schedule. That could
> >> be a command that creates a cron job on platforms that have it, and on
> > 
> > There's Unix system that doesn't have cron.
> > People could use other scheduler mechanism.
> > 
> > A lot of systemd users uses systemd-timer.
> > I'm using snooze.
> 
> Thanks for listing some alternatives. I'll look into these.

I didn't mean to list those alternatives as only possible
alternatives.

The point is people have their own preference to choose a scheduler
that suites their need.

Someone could use their own supervisor system with things like:

	#/bin/sh

	sleep 3600 # 1 hour
	exec git cmd

When "git cmd" exit, the supervisor will start the job again (because
it's down and it needs to be run).

> > Each of those set of utilities have different grammar and
> > configuration.
> > 
> >> Windows it could create a scheduled task instead.
> 
> >> 2. "run-on-repos" uses command-line arguments or config to launch "git
> >>    -C <dir> maintenance run" for all configured directories. The
> >>    intention is that this is launched on some schedule by a platform-
> >>    specific scheduling mechanism (i.e. cron).
> > 
> > So, IIUC, Git will have a _hard_ dependencies on cron on *nix?
> > Else, we're gonna received a bug-report that some tools doesn't work?
> 
> No. Such a dependency would be unacceptable. I'm just using cron
> as an example when available.

That will be too many possible solutions out there,
I'm still not convinced on adding a scheduler to Git.

> > I've seen some bug report in our distro that "git add -p" doesn't work
> > like documented, because it's in "git-perl" packages.
> > When we merge "git-perl" back to git, other people (who never use
> > "git add -p" and git-sendemail) complain why does we add a hard dependencies
> > on perl to git.
> 
> Good news: "git add -p" is becoming a builtin with a lot of work by
> some determined contributors.

Yeah, I knew it. t3701.{44,46} is also fixed with the builtin.
But, it will be some version into the future to be enabled by default.

The point is there're people that don't want to see a new hard
dependencies for Git.

-- 
Danh