From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Luis Henriques Subject: Re: [PATCH] ceph: canonicalize server path in place Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2020 18:23:38 +0100 Message-ID: <20200407172338.GA20223@suse.com> References: <20200211095314.28931-1-idryomov@gmail.com> <4adab4636c62b614d8460ecac70225c9ce485b37.camel@kernel.org> <20200407135204.GA31471@suse.com> <2fc4a60980d697c3b68a996596c7f860cca7d0cd.camel@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:59958 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726395AbgDGRXT (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Apr 2020 13:23:19 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2fc4a60980d697c3b68a996596c7f860cca7d0cd.camel@kernel.org> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Jeff Layton Cc: Ilya Dryomov , ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, Xiubo Li On Tue, Apr 07, 2020 at 11:19:48AM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > On Tue, 2020-04-07 at 14:52 +0100, Luis Henriques wrote: ... > I'm fine with getting stable to pick both of those up. Great! > Looks like the main conflicts are due to the mount option parsing > changes? If you had to massage the patches to get them to merge, then > you should note that in the changelog so Greg knows why you're sending > him a backport rather than just asking him to pick it. > > Otherwise I think these look good to me. Awesome, thanks. I'll try to get these tested a bit for those stable kernels and send the backports to Greg. Cheers, -- Luís