From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93FE4C352BE for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 16:54:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (gabe.freedesktop.org [131.252.210.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7310F2054F for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 16:54:35 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7310F2054F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Received: from gabe.freedesktop.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 135C06E4F9; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 16:54:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120]) by gabe.freedesktop.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2DFF6E4F9 for ; Tue, 14 Apr 2020 16:54:34 +0000 (UTC) IronPort-SDR: e1UuHBw9cbuG8Jytdyk+KSnnOE4Ya1TAUerywC5ncQoaQklibDvkprSACXZJIF9PTkoeClGCIR D/A9ZPYhly+A== X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 14 Apr 2020 09:54:31 -0700 IronPort-SDR: p/SDsrvsXUcm6HTfUWYsi+HtOtOUnrmmACPfIp/xEXjZ1zoBTJ9JyGxo9v/l2ZqEwlGkvprwr/ +Jy9WyPAbPnQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.72,383,1580803200"; d="scan'208";a="298756928" Received: from stinkbox.fi.intel.com (HELO stinkbox) ([10.237.72.174]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with SMTP; 14 Apr 2020 09:54:29 -0700 Received: by stinkbox (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 14 Apr 2020 19:54:29 +0300 Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 19:54:29 +0300 From: Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= To: Kai Vehmanen Message-ID: <20200414165429.GC6112@intel.com> References: <20200330144421.11632-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com> <20200409180418.GY6112@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Patchwork-Hint: comment User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [RESEND PATCH] drm/i915: do AUD_FREQ_CNTRL state save on all gen9+ platforms X-BeenThere: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Intel graphics driver community testing & development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Jani Nikula , intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Errors-To: intel-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Sender: "Intel-gfx" On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 01:32:49PM +0300, Kai Vehmanen wrote: > Hey, > = > On Thu, 9 Apr 2020, Ville Syrj=E4l=E4 wrote: > = > > On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 05:14:01PM +0300, Kai Vehmanen wrote: > > > type of content free ping, but I still dare to seek your input on wha= t is = > > > the proper way to get attention to a patch that are seemingly forever = > > > stuck on the review sideline. > > = > > And what is this? > > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/347148/?series=3D71527&rev=3D1 > = > that's a lost child I'm afraid. It's essentially the same patch I = > submitted late last year. It got review ok from Matt, and I thought it wa= s = > going to be merged and went on to do other things -- i.e. I failed to = > follow-up on this. Back then I did not know about any actual bugs this = > would fix -- this was a generic change to align with hw specs. > = > Fast forward two months. I had forgotten about that previous patch, and = > I ended up recreating the same patch to fix an actual bug. I.e. the of = > this thread: > https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/74664/ OK. I sucked in the rb from the old patch and pushed the new version. Thanks. > = > I only very recently noticed the old patch. But alas, the new attempt = > is probably the one that should be merged as it has more information in = > the commit message (we now know about actual issues on JSL). > = > > Just ping on original patch or ping someone on irc. Resending > > the same patch over and over does no good. At least my brain just > > ignores anything that looks like it's just a resend w/o any clear > > justification. > = > Ack, thanks a lot, this clarifies. In any case, patch author should own = > the follow-up and I definitely dropped the ball on the older #347148 . > = > Br, Kai -- = Ville Syrj=E4l=E4 Intel _______________________________________________ Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx