All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Segher Boessenkool <segher@kernel.crashing.org>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
	Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Peter Oberparleiter <oberpar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
	Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 04/12] fault_inject: Don't rely on "return value" from WRITE_ONCE()
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 17:52:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200415165218.20251-5-will@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200415165218.20251-1-will@kernel.org>

It's a bit weird that WRITE_ONCE() evaluates to the value it stores and
it's different to smp_store_release(), which can't be used this way.

In preparation for preventing this in WRITE_ONCE(), change the fault
injection code to use a local variable instead.

Cc: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
---
 lib/fault-inject.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/fault-inject.c b/lib/fault-inject.c
index 8186ca84910b..ce12621b4275 100644
--- a/lib/fault-inject.c
+++ b/lib/fault-inject.c
@@ -106,7 +106,9 @@ bool should_fail(struct fault_attr *attr, ssize_t size)
 		unsigned int fail_nth = READ_ONCE(current->fail_nth);
 
 		if (fail_nth) {
-			if (!WRITE_ONCE(current->fail_nth, fail_nth - 1))
+			fail_nth--;
+			WRITE_ONCE(current->fail_nth, fail_nth);
+			if (!fail_nth)
 				goto fail;
 
 			return false;
-- 
2.26.0.110.g2183baf09c-goog

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-15 16:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-15 16:52 [PATCH v3 00/12] Rework READ_ONCE() to improve codegen Will Deacon
2020-04-15 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] compiler/gcc: Emit build-time warning for GCC prior to version 4.8 Will Deacon
2020-04-15 17:20   ` Masahiro Yamada
2020-04-15 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] netfilter: Avoid assigning 'const' pointer to non-const pointer Will Deacon
2020-04-15 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] net: tls: " Will Deacon
2020-04-15 16:52 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2020-04-15 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] arm64: csum: Disable KASAN for do_csum() Will Deacon
2020-04-15 17:28   ` Mark Rutland
2020-04-15 18:42     ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-15 19:43       ` Will Deacon
2020-04-15 20:10         ` Will Deacon
2020-04-15 19:26     ` Will Deacon
2020-04-16  9:31       ` Mark Rutland
2020-04-16 11:53         ` Will Deacon
2020-04-16 12:11           ` Mark Rutland
2020-04-15 19:26   ` Robin Murphy
2020-04-15 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] READ_ONCE: Simplify implementations of {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() Will Deacon
2020-04-15 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] READ_ONCE: Enforce atomicity for {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() memory accesses Will Deacon
2020-04-15 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] READ_ONCE: Drop pointer qualifiers when reading from scalar types Will Deacon
2020-04-15 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] locking/barriers: Use '__unqual_scalar_typeof' for load-acquire macros Will Deacon
2020-04-15 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] arm64: barrier: Use '__unqual_scalar_typeof' for acquire/release macros Will Deacon
2020-04-15 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] compiler/gcc: Raise minimum GCC version for kernel builds to 4.8 Will Deacon
2020-04-15 18:37   ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-15 16:52 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] gcov: Remove old GCC 3.4 support Will Deacon
2020-04-16 12:30 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] Rework READ_ONCE() to improve codegen Christian Borntraeger
2020-04-16 12:48   ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200415165218.20251-5-will@kernel.org \
    --to=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=akinobu.mita@gmail.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luc.vanoostenryck@gmail.com \
    --cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=oberpar@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=segher@kernel.crashing.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.