From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.6 068/129] slcan: Don't transmit uninitialized stack data in padding Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2020 19:22:43 +0200 Message-ID: <20200415172243.GA3661754@kroah.com> References: <20200415113445.11881-1-sashal@kernel.org> <20200415113445.11881-68-sashal@kernel.org> <87h7xkisln.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from new4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.230]:50063 "EHLO new4-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2410883AbgDORWs (ORCPT ); Wed, 15 Apr 2020 13:22:48 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87h7xkisln.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> Sender: linux-can-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Sasha Levin , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, Richard Palethorpe , Kees Cook , linux-can@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, security@kernel.org, wg@grandegger.com, mkl@pengutronix.de, davem@davemloft.net On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 12:09:08PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > > How does this differ from Greg's backports of this patches? His tool didn't catch that they are already in a merged tree, it's a few steps later that this happens :) greg k-h