From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com>,
Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@intel.com>,
Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] vhost: disable for OABI
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 10:16:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200420101511-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200420082909.GA28749@infradead.org>
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 01:29:09AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 06:20:20PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > vhost is currently broken on the some ARM configs.
> >
> > The reason is that that uses apcs-gnu which is the ancient OABI that is been
> > deprecated for a long time.
> >
> > Given that virtio support on such ancient systems is not needed in the
> > first place, let's just add something along the lines of
> >
> > depends on !ARM || AEABI
> >
> > to the virtio Kconfig declaration, and add a comment that it has to do
> > with struct member alignment.
> >
> > Note: we can't make VHOST and VHOST_RING themselves have
> > a dependency since these are selected. Add a new symbol for that.
>
> This description is horrible. The only interesting thing for ARM OABI
> is that it has some strange padding rules, but that isn't something
> that can't be handled. Please spend some time looking into the issue
> and add te proper __padded annotations, we've done that elsewhere in
> the kernel and it isn't too bad - in fact it helps understanding issues
> with implicit alignment.
Yes I have a patch queued to fix it. I wanted a minimal patch for this
release though.
> And even if you have a good reason not to fix vhost (which I think you
> don't have) this changelog is just utter crap, as it fails to mention
> what the problem with ARM OABI even is.
I'll tweak that, thanks!
--
MST
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-20 14:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-16 22:20 [PATCH v3] vhost: disable for OABI Michael S. Tsirkin
2020-04-20 8:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-20 14:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200420101511-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=Richard.Earnshaw@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=ashutosh.dixit@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.dutt@intel.com \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.