From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: fstests@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, guaneryu@gmail.com,
bfoster@redhat.com, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: [RFC PATCH v2] generic: test reporting of wb errors via syncfs
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 12:21:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200420162143.28170-1-jlayton@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200414120740.293998-1-jlayton@kernel.org>
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Add a test for new syncfs error reporting behavior. When an inode fails
to be written back, ensure that a subsequent call to syncfs() will also
report an error.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
---
tests/generic/999 | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/generic/999.out | 8 +++++
tests/generic/group | 1 +
3 files changed, 88 insertions(+)
create mode 100755 tests/generic/999
create mode 100644 tests/generic/999.out
v2:
- update license comment
- only write a page of data
- don't bother testing for enough scratch space
- don't hold file open over test
Thanks to Brian Foster for the review! This is testing a proposed
behavior change and is dependent on this patchset being merged:
vfs: have syncfs() return error when there are writeback errors
We'll probably want to wait until its fate is clear before merging this.
diff --git a/tests/generic/999 b/tests/generic/999
new file mode 100755
index 000000000000..cdc0772d0774
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/generic/999
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+#! /bin/bash
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0+
+# Copyright (c) 2020, Jeff Layton. All rights reserved.
+# FS QA Test No. 999
+#
+# Open a file and write to it and fsync. Then, flip the data device to throw
+# errors, write to it again and do an fdatasync. Then open an O_RDONLY fd on
+# the same file and call syncfs against it and ensure that an error is reported.
+# Then call syncfs again and ensure that no error is reported. Finally, repeat
+# the open and syncfs and ensure that there is no error reported.
+
+seq=`basename $0`
+seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
+echo "QA output created by $seq"
+
+here=`pwd`
+tmp=/tmp/$$
+status=1 # failure is the default!
+trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15
+
+_cleanup()
+{
+ cd /
+ rm -f $tmp.*
+ _dmerror_cleanup
+}
+
+# get standard environment, filters and checks
+. ./common/rc
+. ./common/filter
+. ./common/dmerror
+
+# real QA test starts here
+_supported_os Linux
+_require_scratch_nocheck
+# This test uses "dm" without taking into account the data could be on
+# realtime subvolume, thus the test will fail with rtinherit=1
+_require_no_rtinherit
+_require_dm_target error
+
+rm -f $seqres.full
+
+echo "Format and mount"
+_scratch_mkfs > $seqres.full 2>&1
+_dmerror_init
+_dmerror_mount
+
+
+# create file
+testfile=$SCRATCH_MNT/syncfs-reports-errors
+touch $testfile
+
+# write a page of data to file, and call fsync
+datalen=$(getconf PAGE_SIZE)
+$XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -W -q 0 $datalen" $testfile
+
+# flip device to non-working mode
+_dmerror_load_error_table
+
+# rewrite the data and call fdatasync
+$XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -w -q 0 $datalen" $testfile
+
+# heal the device error
+_dmerror_load_working_table
+
+# open again and call syncfs twice
+echo "One of the following syncfs calls should fail with EIO:"
+$XFS_IO_PROG -r -c syncfs -c syncfs $testfile
+echo "done"
+
+echo "This syncfs call should succeed:"
+$XFS_IO_PROG -r -c syncfs $testfile
+echo "done"
+
+# success, all done
+_dmerror_cleanup
+
+status=0
+exit
diff --git a/tests/generic/999.out b/tests/generic/999.out
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..950a2ba42503
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/generic/999.out
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+QA output created by 999
+Format and mount
+fdatasync: Input/output error
+One of the following syncfs calls should fail with EIO:
+syncfs: Input/output error
+done
+This syncfs call should succeed:
+done
diff --git a/tests/generic/group b/tests/generic/group
index 718575baeef9..9bcf296fc3dd 100644
--- a/tests/generic/group
+++ b/tests/generic/group
@@ -598,3 +598,4 @@
594 auto quick quota
595 auto quick encrypt
596 auto quick
+999 auto quick
--
2.25.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-20 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-14 12:07 [RFC PATCH xfstests] generic: test reporting of wb errors via syncfs Jeff Layton
2020-04-14 12:25 ` Jeff Layton
2020-04-17 15:36 ` Brian Foster
2020-04-20 11:33 ` Jeff Layton
2020-04-20 14:24 ` Brian Foster
2020-04-20 16:21 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2020-04-21 14:21 ` [RFC PATCH v2] " Brian Foster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200420162143.28170-1-jlayton@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=fstests@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=guaneryu@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.