From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf record: add dummy event during system wide synthesis
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:46:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200422084635.GF962614@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200421061103.109440-1-irogers@google.com>
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 11:11:03PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> During the processing of /proc during event synthesis new processes may
> start. Add a dummy event if /proc is to be processed, to capture mmaps
> for starting processes. This reuses the existing logic for
> initial-delay.
>
> v2 fixes the dummy event configuration and a branch stack issue.
heya,
it's breaking attr tests for me:
[jolsa@krava perf]$ sudo ./perf test -v 17
17: Setup struct perf_event_attr :
--- start ---
test child forked, pid 1046560
running './tests/attr/test-record-graph-default'
running './tests/attr/test-record-raw'
running './tests/attr/test-record-branch-filter-any'
running './tests/attr/test-record-freq'
running './tests/attr/test-record-branch-any'
running './tests/attr/test-stat-group1'
running './tests/attr/test-record-no-samples'
running './tests/attr/test-record-graph-dwarf'
running './tests/attr/test-stat-C0'
running './tests/attr/test-stat-basic'
running './tests/attr/test-record-group'
running './tests/attr/test-record-branch-filter-k'
running './tests/attr/test-stat-group'
running './tests/attr/test-record-C0'
expected config=0, got 9
expected sample_type=391, got 455
expected disabled=1, got 0
FAILED './tests/attr/test-record-C0' - match failure
test child finished with -1
---- end ----
Setup struct perf_event_attr: FAILED!
jirka
>
> Suggested-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
> tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 5 ++++-
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> index 1ab349abe904..8d1e93351298 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> @@ -805,19 +805,28 @@ static int record__open(struct record *rec)
> int rc = 0;
>
> /*
> - * For initial_delay we need to add a dummy event so that we can track
> - * PERF_RECORD_MMAP while we wait for the initial delay to enable the
> - * real events, the ones asked by the user.
> + * For initial_delay or system wide, we need to add a dummy event so
> + * that we can track PERF_RECORD_MMAP to cover the delay of waiting or
> + * event synthesis.
> */
> - if (opts->initial_delay) {
> + if (opts->initial_delay || target__has_cpu(&opts->target)) {
> if (perf_evlist__add_dummy(evlist))
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + /* Disable tracking of mmaps on lead event. */
> pos = evlist__first(evlist);
> pos->tracking = 0;
> + /* Set up dummy event. */
> pos = evlist__last(evlist);
> pos->tracking = 1;
> - pos->core.attr.enable_on_exec = 1;
> + /*
> + * Enable the dummy event when the process is forked for
> + * initial_delay, immediately for system wide.
> + */
> + if (opts->initial_delay)
> + pos->core.attr.enable_on_exec = 1;
> + else
> + pos->immediate = 1;
> }
>
> perf_evlist__config(evlist, opts, &callchain_param);
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> index 6a571d322bb2..ca8f9533d8f9 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> @@ -1163,11 +1163,14 @@ void perf_evsel__config(struct evsel *evsel, struct record_opts *opts,
> }
>
> /*
> + * A dummy event never triggers any actual counter and therefore
> + * cannot be used with branch_stack.
> + *
> * For initial_delay, a dummy event is added implicitly.
> * The software event will trigger -EOPNOTSUPP error out,
> * if BRANCH_STACK bit is set.
> */
> - if (opts->initial_delay && is_dummy_event(evsel))
> + if (is_dummy_event(evsel))
> perf_evsel__reset_sample_bit(evsel, BRANCH_STACK);
> }
>
> --
> 2.26.1.301.g55bc3eb7cb9-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-22 8:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-21 6:11 [PATCH v2] perf record: add dummy event during system wide synthesis Ian Rogers
2020-04-22 8:46 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2020-04-22 17:37 ` Ian Rogers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200422084635.GF962614@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.