From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>
To: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"selinux@vger.kernel.org" <selinux@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] perf trace: substitute CAP_SYS_ADMIN with CAP_PERFMON in error message
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 10:20:52 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200423132052.GA19437@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <450d035a-c192-10e5-1c28-664ccae3e46e@linux.intel.com>
Em Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 05:44:02PM +0300, Alexey Budankov escreveu:
>
> Update error message to mention CAP_PERFMON only. CAP_SYS_ADMIN still
> works in keeping with user space backward compatibility approach.
This will confuse users that build the latest perf to use in older
systems where CAP_PERFMON isn't available, probably we need to, in these
cases, check for the existence of CAP_PERFMON to provide a better
warning message, something like:
You need CAP_ADMIN or update your kernel and libcap to one that supports
CAP_PERFMON.
For systems without CAP_PERFMON, while mentioning only CAP_PERFMON for
systems where it is present, right?
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
> index 55eda54240fb..39d43ad02f30 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-ftrace.c
> @@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ static int __cmd_ftrace(struct perf_ftrace *ftrace, int argc, const char **argv)
> perf_cap__capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))) {
> pr_err("ftrace only works for %s!\n",
> #ifdef HAVE_LIBCAP_SUPPORT
> - "users with the CAP_PERFMON or CAP_SYS_ADMIN capability"
> + "users with the CAP_PERFMON capability"
> #else
> "root"
> #endif
> --
> 2.24.1
>
--
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-23 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-22 14:40 [PATCH v2 0/4] perf: make Perf tool aware of SELinux access control Alexey Budankov
2020-04-22 14:44 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] perf trace: substitute CAP_SYS_ADMIN with CAP_PERFMON in error message Alexey Budankov
2020-04-23 13:20 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2020-04-23 14:49 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-04-23 18:10 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-04-22 14:44 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] perf docs: substitute CAP_SYS_ADMIN with CAP_PERFMON where needed Alexey Budankov
2020-04-23 13:22 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-04-23 14:51 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-04-22 14:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] perf tool: make Perf tool aware of SELinux access control Alexey Budankov
2020-04-23 13:27 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-04-23 14:58 ` Alexey Budankov
2020-04-22 14:47 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] perf docs: introduce security.txt file to document related issues Alexey Budankov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200423132052.GA19437@kernel.org \
--to=arnaldo.melo@gmail.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.