From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Cathy Avery <cavery@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
vkuznets@redhat.com, wei.huang2@amd.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: check_nested_events if there is an injectable NMI
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 08:35:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200423153531.GC17824@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ae2d4f5d-cb96-f63a-7742-a7f46ad0d1a8@redhat.com>
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 05:10:45PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 23/04/20 16:42, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 04:11:07PM -0400, Cathy Avery wrote:
> >> With NMI intercept moved to check_nested_events there is a race
> >> condition where vcpu->arch.nmi_pending is set late causing
> > How is nmi_pending set late? The KVM_{G,S}ET_VCPU_EVENTS paths can't set
> > it because the current KVM_RUN thread holds the mutex, and the only other
> > call to process_nmi() is in the request path of vcpu_enter_guest, which has
> > already executed.
> >
>
> I think the actual cause is priority inversion between NMI and
> interrupts, because NMI is added last in patch 1.
Ah, that makes more sense. I stared/glared at this exact code for a long
while and came to the conclusion that the "late" behavior was exclusive to
interrupts, would have been a shame if all that glaring was for naught.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-23 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-14 20:11 [PATCH 0/2] KVM: SVM: Implement check_nested_events for NMI Cathy Avery
2020-04-14 20:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] " Cathy Avery
2020-04-14 20:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: check_nested_events if there is an injectable NMI Cathy Avery
2020-04-23 14:42 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-23 15:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-23 15:35 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2020-04-23 15:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-23 18:32 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-23 15:36 ` Cathy Avery
2020-04-23 15:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-23 18:33 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-04-23 18:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-15 9:49 ` [PATCH 0/2] KVM: SVM: Implement check_nested_events for NMI Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-04-15 12:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-04-23 13:43 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200423153531.GC17824@linux.intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=cavery@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wei.huang2@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.