From: Guillaume Nault <gnault@redhat.com>
To: linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: PPPoE Modem hangup after random time - how to debug?
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 20:30:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200427203034.GA4949@pc-3.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPJ9Yc8Wvxb_UoqGu=wrrWX2HP5AwE98jvcS3XYnvevxa0RZpg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 11:59:25AM +0200, David Balažic wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 at 04:14, Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> >
> >
> > David Balažic <xerces9@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Sun Apr 26 17:34:57 2020 daemon.debug pppd[20289]: sent [IPV6CP
> > > ConfReq id=0x1 <addr fe80::d035:60ed:928e:f741>]
> > > Sun Apr 26 17:35:00 2020 daemon.debug pppd[20289]: sent [IPV6CP
> > > ConfReq id=0x1 <addr fe80::d035:60ed:928e:f741>]
> > > Sun Apr 26 17:35:03 2020 daemon.debug pppd[20289]: sent [IPV6CP
> > > ConfReq id=0x1 <addr fe80::d035:60ed:928e:f741>]
> > > Sun Apr 26 17:35:06 2020 daemon.debug pppd[20289]: sent [IPV6CP
> > > ConfReq id=0x1 <addr fe80::d035:60ed:928e:f741>]
> > > Sun Apr 26 17:35:09 2020 daemon.warn pppd[20289]: IPV6CP: timeout
> > > sending Config-Requests
> >
> > Could this be the reason for the hangup?
> > pppd gets tired of no IPv6, decides it should hangup?
>
> These lines are logged in the 30 seconds after the connection is
> established. Later they never show up. It was like that for all
> connections thus far.
>
Your provider doesn't support IPv6. As James pointed out, it isn't even
capable of reporting that fact. So your device keeps trying for a few
seconds. Nothing to worry about (appart that you won't have IPv6
connectivity of course).
> > > The strange part is in the tcpdump there is a PADT sent to an
> > > "unknown" MAC and my pppd responds. At least that is how I see it.
> >
> > > You think NOT putting the interface into promiscuous mode (done by
> > > tcpdump) would prevent this?
> > > Anyway, now I startted tcpdump with the -p option: tcpdump -e -v -p
> > > -i eth1 vlan 3902 and pppoed
> >
> > It could be that promisc mode (no -p) means that the PADT makes something
> > break, different than what you are investigating. -p avoid promisc mode, so
> > would avoid seeing that packet.
> >
> > You mention in another thread that you were trying to do DHCPv6 on a
> > different (non-PPPoE) interface. I don't see how that would matter unless
> > the failure caused netifd to decide to retry it all.
> >
> > It seems that you ought to try the noipv6 option to pppd.
>
> I removed it (from the system config, the file /etc/config/network ).
> I also removed that "other interface", so there is no IPv6 stuff left.
> The new command line is:
> /usr/sbin/pppd nodetach ipparam wan ifname pppoe-wan lcp-echo-interval
> 1 lcp-echo-failure 5 lcp-echo-adaptive nodefaultroute usepeerdns
> maxfail 1 user YYYYYY password XXXXX ip-up-script /lib/netifd/ppp-up
> ip-down-script /lib/netifd/ppp-down mtu 1492 mru 1492 plugin
> rp-pppoe.so nic-eth1.3902
>
> For the record: The new connection with new settings was started on
> Mon Apr 27 09:47:48 (UTC)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-27 20:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-22 17:45 PPPoE Modem hangup after random time - how to debug? David Balažic
2020-04-22 19:51 ` Michael Richardson
2020-04-22 22:00 ` James Carlson
2020-04-23 0:08 ` Guillaume Nault
2020-04-23 0:41 ` Michael Richardson
2020-04-23 2:01 ` James Carlson
2020-04-23 10:37 ` David Balažic
2020-04-23 11:12 ` David Balažic
2020-04-23 12:13 ` David Balažic
2020-04-23 15:59 ` Michael Richardson
2020-04-23 16:01 ` Michael Richardson
2020-04-24 13:47 ` David Balažic
2020-04-24 14:02 ` David Balažic
2020-04-24 14:26 ` James Carlson
2020-04-24 15:44 ` Guillaume Nault
2020-04-24 15:54 ` Guillaume Nault
2020-04-26 1:38 ` Michael Richardson
2020-04-26 12:44 ` David Balažic
2020-04-26 12:48 ` David Balažic
2020-04-26 19:03 ` David Balažic
2020-04-27 2:14 ` Michael Richardson
2020-04-27 9:59 ` David Balažic
2020-04-27 13:43 ` James Carlson
2020-04-27 20:08 ` Guillaume Nault
2020-04-27 20:30 ` Guillaume Nault [this message]
2020-04-27 23:34 ` David Balažic
2020-04-28 10:18 ` David Balažic
2020-04-28 11:00 ` Guillaume Nault
2020-04-29 11:58 ` David Balažic
2020-05-03 10:31 ` David Balažic
2020-05-04 12:27 ` Guillaume Nault
2020-05-04 13:01 ` Guillaume Nault
2020-05-04 15:54 ` David Balažic
2020-05-04 16:36 ` David Balažic
2020-05-04 18:11 ` Guillaume Nault
2020-05-04 18:43 ` David Balažic
2020-05-06 9:52 ` David Balažic
2020-05-06 10:34 ` David Balažic
2020-05-06 14:26 ` Guillaume Nault
2020-05-06 15:02 ` Guillaume Nault
2020-05-06 15:15 ` James Carlson
2020-05-06 15:39 ` David Balažic
2020-05-06 15:54 ` David Balažic
2020-05-06 20:20 ` Guillaume Nault
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200427203034.GA4949@pc-3.home \
--to=gnault@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.