From: Paul Chaignon <paul@cilium.io>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr>
Cc: cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
Subject: Re: [Cocci] Exit with non-zero status
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 17:16:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200429151608.GA5703@Mem> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2004291704240.2450@hadrien>
On Wed, Apr 29, 2020 at 05:07:56PM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 29 Apr 2020, Paul Chaignon wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I am trying to exit spatch with a non-zero exit status when required
> > changes have been found. I have tried to add a rule with finalize:python
> > and the following code:
> >
> > @finalize:python@
> > @@
> > exit(cnt)
> >
> > where cnt is incremented by another Python rule everytime a required
> > change is found. This works as expected except for the --in-place option
> > which becomes ineffective.
> >
> > Is this a bug, or is finalize:python not intended to be used in that
> > manner? Is it possible to overwrite spatch's exit status?
>
> I'm actually surprised that this would ever work...
>
> Finalize was intended for processing information in general, eg printing
> some statistics about what was matched.
>
> Would it be feasible to print cnt instead?
Sure. I can easily get around this issue by e.g. grepping for spatch's
messages in a wrapper script. Getting spatch to return a non-zero exit
status is just a convenience. I thought that would be a fairly common
use case.
Thanks for the quick answer as always :)
Paul
>
> julia
_______________________________________________
Cocci mailing list
Cocci@systeme.lip6.fr
https://systeme.lip6.fr/mailman/listinfo/cocci
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-29 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-29 14:39 [Cocci] Exit with non-zero status Paul Chaignon
2020-04-29 15:07 ` Julia Lawall
2020-04-29 15:16 ` Paul Chaignon [this message]
2020-04-29 15:25 ` Julia Lawall
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-04-29 18:40 Markus Elfring
2020-04-29 19:07 ` Paul Chaignon
2020-04-29 19:50 ` Markus Elfring
2020-05-05 9:59 ` Paul Chaignon
2020-05-05 11:08 ` Markus Elfring
2020-05-06 12:01 ` Paul Chaignon
2020-05-06 12:24 ` Markus Elfring
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200429151608.GA5703@Mem \
--to=paul@cilium.io \
--cc=cocci@systeme.lip6.fr \
--cc=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.