From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=eajames@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49CnLV2x5kzDr7Z for ; Fri, 1 May 2020 06:39:46 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098409.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 03UKWlNB161359; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 16:39:43 -0400 Received: from ppma04dal.us.ibm.com (7a.29.35a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.53.41.122]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 30mggxca21-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 30 Apr 2020 16:39:43 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 03UKVLoR010451; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 20:39:42 GMT Received: from b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.29]) by ppma04dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 30mcu7cdhv-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 30 Apr 2020 20:39:42 +0000 Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.108]) by b01cxnp23034.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 03UKdgTG52625884 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 30 Apr 2020 20:39:42 GMT Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E56D9B205F; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 20:39:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53597B2064; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 20:39:41 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ghost4.ibm.com (unknown [9.163.86.64]) by b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 20:39:41 +0000 (GMT) From: Eddie James To: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org Cc: joel@jms.id.au, Eddie James Subject: [PATCH linux dev-5.4 3/3] hwmon: (occ) Add new temperature sensor type Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 15:39:26 -0500 Message-Id: <20200430203926.30081-4-eajames@linux.ibm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.0 In-Reply-To: <20200430203926.30081-1-eajames@linux.ibm.com> References: <20200430203926.30081-1-eajames@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-04-30_12:2020-04-30, 2020-04-30 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 impostorscore=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=1 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 clxscore=1015 mlxlogscore=999 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2004300150 X-BeenThere: openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Development list for OpenBMC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 20:39:46 -0000 The latest version of the On-Chip Controller (OCC) has a different format for the temperature sensor data. Add a new temperature sensor version to handle this data. Signed-off-by: Eddie James --- drivers/hwmon/occ/common.c | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/occ/common.c b/drivers/hwmon/occ/common.c index 30e18eb60da7..3e580a83ae61 100644 --- a/drivers/hwmon/occ/common.c +++ b/drivers/hwmon/occ/common.c @@ -41,6 +41,14 @@ struct temp_sensor_2 { u8 value; } __packed; +struct temp_sensor_10 { + u32 sensor_id; + u8 fru_type; + u8 value; + u8 throttle; + u8 reserved; +} __packed; + struct freq_sensor_1 { u16 sensor_id; u16 value; @@ -307,6 +315,60 @@ static ssize_t occ_show_temp_2(struct device *dev, return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE - 1, "%u\n", val); } +static ssize_t occ_show_temp_10(struct device *dev, + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) +{ + int rc; + u32 val = 0; + struct temp_sensor_10 *temp; + struct occ *occ = dev_get_drvdata(dev); + struct occ_sensors *sensors = &occ->sensors; + struct sensor_device_attribute_2 *sattr = to_sensor_dev_attr_2(attr); + + rc = occ_update_response(occ); + if (rc) + return rc; + + temp = ((struct temp_sensor_10 *)sensors->temp.data) + sattr->index; + + switch (sattr->nr) { + case 0: + val = get_unaligned_be32(&temp->sensor_id); + break; + case 1: + val = temp->value; + if (val == OCC_TEMP_SENSOR_FAULT) + return -EREMOTEIO; + + /* + * VRM doesn't return temperature, only alarm bit. This + * attribute maps to tempX_alarm instead of tempX_input for + * VRM + */ + if (temp->fru_type != OCC_FRU_TYPE_VRM) { + /* sensor not ready */ + if (val == 0) + return -EAGAIN; + + val *= 1000; + } + break; + case 2: + val = temp->fru_type; + break; + case 3: + val = temp->value == OCC_TEMP_SENSOR_FAULT; + break; + case 4: + val = temp->throttle * 1000; + break; + default: + return -EINVAL; + } + + return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE - 1, "%u\n", val); +} + static ssize_t occ_show_freq_1(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) { @@ -745,6 +807,9 @@ static int occ_setup_sensor_attrs(struct occ *occ) num_attrs += (sensors->temp.num_sensors * 4); show_temp = occ_show_temp_2; break; + case 0x10: + show_temp = occ_show_temp_10; + break; default: sensors->temp.num_sensors = 0; } -- 2.24.0