From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Remaining randconfig objtool warnings, linux-next-20200428
Date: Fri, 1 May 2020 19:26:16 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200501172616.GG3762@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a3exNWHzv7pyV4yvn2hPxUswzSF=G3UJ=evykT5bjfEsw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 07:21:31PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 4:05 PM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> it gets into undefined behavior and stops emitting code after the call to
> Do we consider this expected behavior on gcc's side, or is it something
> that should not happen and needs a gcc bug report?
When it hits UB it is of course free to do whatever it damn well
pleases, but just stopping code gen seems a little extreme, at least
issue a WARN that something is up or so.
Not sure how the GCC folks feel about this though.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-01 17:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-28 14:49 Remaining randconfig objtool warnings, linux-next-20200428 Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-28 16:10 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-28 19:11 ` Kees Cook
2020-04-28 20:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-28 20:38 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-28 21:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-28 22:03 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-28 22:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-28 22:48 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-28 23:08 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-29 18:55 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-29 22:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-29 23:01 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-29 23:11 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-29 23:28 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-30 13:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-30 14:33 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-30 19:46 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-30 20:59 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-04-30 21:10 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-30 21:08 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-30 23:02 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-29 19:18 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-05-01 12:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-30 14:05 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-05-01 0:28 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-05-01 11:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-05-01 17:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-01 12:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-01 1:07 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-05-01 11:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-05-01 12:33 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-01 13:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-05-01 15:49 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-05-01 17:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-05-01 17:26 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-05-01 17:50 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-05-01 19:47 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200501172616.GG3762@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.