From: Shourya Shukla <shouryashukla.oo@gmail.com>
To: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com, sandals@crustytoothpaste.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] gitfaq: fetching and pulling a repository
Date: Sat, 2 May 2020 12:27:45 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200502065745.GD5582@konoha> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABPp-BFt_5-OyOw9YbYJhhu1P4CJLOi65wdyRckOY5_acRejGg@mail.gmail.com>
On 29/04 08:56, Elijah Newren wrote:
> > +[[fetching-and-pulling]]
> > +How do I know if I want to do a fetch or a pull?::
> > + A fetch brings in the latest changes made upstream (i.e., the
> > + remote repository we are working on). This allows us to inspect
> > + the changes made upstream and integrate all those changes (if
> > + and only if we want to) or only cherry pick certain changes.
> > + Fetching does not have any immediate effects on the local
> > + repository.
>
> Maybe change that last sentence to "Fetching does not modify the
> current branch"? The local repository certainly gets bigger, and the
> remote tracking branches are updated as well as their reflogs, and it
> might trigger a gc, all of which sound like immediate effects to me.
I meant changes in terms of the user's code. Yep you are right, I need
to be precise here.
> > +
> > + A pull is a wrapper for a fetch and merge. This means that doing
>
> ...for a fetch and merge or a fetch and rebase. This means...
>
> > + a `git pull` will not only fetch the changes made upstream but
> > + integrate them as well with our local repository. The merge may
>
> ...with our current branch. The merge or rebase...
>
> > + go smoothly or have merge conflicts depending on the case. A pull
> > + does not allow you to review any changes made upstream but rather
> > + merge those changes on their own.
>
> I don't understand this last sentence. You can definitely review
> changes made upstream after a pull; e.g. git log @{u}@{1}..@{u}
I meant that the pull will apply the changes right away and one does not
get the chance to review what is being applied before it has been
applied (something a fetch does). I need to be more clear here,
understood.
> > ++
> > +This is the reason why it is sometimes advised to fetch the changes
> > +first and then merge them accordingly because not every change might
> > +be of utility to the user.
>
> I don't understand the purpose of this paragraph.
I intended to emphasise the difference between a fetch and a pull; the
fact that fetch just brings in the changes from the remote and doesnot
apply them to our code/files right away, while a pull does so.
Also, a nit but, we are supposed to use 1 SP or 2 SP after a full
stop(.)? In India we use 1 SP, is it different in other countries?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-02 7:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-29 9:38 [PATCH v4 1/4] gitfaq: files in .gitignore are tracked Shourya Shukla
2020-04-29 9:38 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] gitfaq: changing the remote of a repository Shourya Shukla
2020-04-29 16:17 ` Elijah Newren
2020-04-29 17:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-29 9:38 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] gitfaq: shallow cloning " Shourya Shukla
2020-04-29 16:00 ` Elijah Newren
2020-05-02 5:00 ` Shourya Shukla
2020-04-29 17:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-05-02 6:13 ` Shourya Shukla
2020-05-04 16:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-05-05 12:26 ` Derrick Stolee
2021-05-06 2:49 ` dyrone teng
2020-04-29 9:38 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] gitfaq: fetching and pulling " Shourya Shukla
2020-04-29 15:56 ` Elijah Newren
2020-04-29 17:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-05-02 6:57 ` Shourya Shukla [this message]
2020-05-02 19:00 ` Elijah Newren
2020-05-03 1:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2020-04-29 16:16 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] gitfaq: files in .gitignore are tracked Elijah Newren
2020-05-02 6:36 ` Shourya Shukla
2020-04-29 16:55 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200502065745.GD5582@konoha \
--to=shouryashukla.oo@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=newren@gmail.com \
--cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.