From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail27.static.mailgun.info ([104.130.122.27]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jWZI3-0004Th-Ab for ath11k@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 07 May 2020 05:41:48 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ath11k: Add support for multibus support From: Kalle Valo In-Reply-To: <20200506094400.4740-2-govinds@codeaurora.org> References: <20200506094400.4740-2-govinds@codeaurora.org> Message-Id: <20200507054144.E8F95C433BA@smtp.codeaurora.org> Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 05:41:44 +0000 (UTC) List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath11k" Errors-To: ath11k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Govind Singh Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, ath11k@lists.infradead.org Govind Singh wrote: > Current design supports only AHB interface for > 11ax chipset. Refactor the code by adding hif layer > for bus level abstraction to support PCI based device. > > Signed-off-by: Govind Singh > Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo This had sparse warnings, I fixed them in the pending branch: drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/ahb.c:1020:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'ath11k_ahb_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/ahb.c:1026:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'ath11k_ahb_exit' [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/ahb.c:1020:5: warning: symbol 'ath11k_ahb_init' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/ahb.c:1026:6: warning: symbol 'ath11k_ahb_exit' was not declared. Should it be static? -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11530873/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches _______________________________________________ ath11k mailing list ath11k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath11k