From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27771C38A24 for ; Thu, 7 May 2020 12:27:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 068572083B for ; Thu, 7 May 2020 12:27:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726495AbgEGM1Y (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2020 08:27:24 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:46274 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725923AbgEGM1Y (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2020 08:27:24 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id D900068B05; Thu, 7 May 2020 14:27:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 14:27:18 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Brian Foster Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] xfs: split xfs_iformat_fork Message-ID: <20200507122718.GA17936@lst.de> References: <20200501081424.2598914-1-hch@lst.de> <20200501081424.2598914-4-hch@lst.de> <20200501133431.GJ40250@bfoster> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200501133431.GJ40250@bfoster> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-xfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 09:34:31AM -0400, Brian Foster wrote: > > + default: > > + xfs_inode_verifier_error(ip, -EFSCORRUPTED, __func__, dip, > > + sizeof(*dip), __this_address); > > + return -EFSCORRUPTED; > > + } > > Can we fix this function up to use an error variable and return error at > the end like xfs_iformat_attr_work() does? Otherwise nice cleanup.. What would the benefit of a local variable be here? It just adds a little extra code for no real gain.