All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
	Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
	kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] perf counts: Reset prev_raw_counts counts
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 17:19:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200507151932.GF2804092@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200507065822.8255-3-yao.jin@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 02:58:20PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
> The evsel->prev_raw_counts is updated in perf_evsel__compute_deltas:
> 
> perf_evsel__compute_deltas()
> {
> 	tmp = *perf_counts(evsel->prev_raw_counts, cpu, thread);
> 	*perf_counts(evsel->prev_raw_counts, cpu, thread) = *count;
> }
> 
> When we want to reset the evsel->prev_raw_counts in
> perf_evsel__reset_prev_raw_counts, zeroing the aggr is not enough,
> we need to reset the counts too.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/counts.c | 5 +++++
>  tools/perf/util/counts.h | 2 ++
>  tools/perf/util/stat.c   | 1 +
>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/counts.c b/tools/perf/util/counts.c
> index f94e1a23dad6..af3bf36f7c63 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/counts.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/counts.c
> @@ -64,3 +64,8 @@ void perf_evsel__free_counts(struct evsel *evsel)
>  	perf_counts__delete(evsel->counts);
>  	evsel->counts = NULL;
>  }
> +
> +void perf_evsel__reset_raw_counts(struct evsel *evsel)
> +{
> +	perf_counts__reset(evsel->prev_raw_counts);
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/counts.h b/tools/perf/util/counts.h
> index 92196df4945f..15bb9acb7cb0 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/counts.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/counts.h
> @@ -42,4 +42,6 @@ void perf_evsel__reset_counts(struct evsel *evsel);
>  int perf_evsel__alloc_counts(struct evsel *evsel, int ncpus, int nthreads);
>  void perf_evsel__free_counts(struct evsel *evsel);
>  
> +void perf_evsel__reset_raw_counts(struct evsel *evsel);
> +
>  #endif /* __PERF_COUNTS_H */
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/stat.c b/tools/perf/util/stat.c
> index 774468341851..89e541564ed5 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/stat.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/stat.c
> @@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ static void perf_evsel__reset_prev_raw_counts(struct evsel *evsel)
>  		evsel->prev_raw_counts->aggr.val = 0;
>  		evsel->prev_raw_counts->aggr.ena = 0;
>  		evsel->prev_raw_counts->aggr.run = 0;
> +		perf_evsel__reset_raw_counts(evsel);

that seems needed, but we have it scathered all over the place,
could you centralize the reset? the way I see it the perf_counts__reset
should zero all the members of struct perf_counts.. so also
the aggr values

it could also check for counts != NULL and we could call it
instead of:
  perf_evsel__reset_prev_raw_counts
    perf_evsel__reset_raw_counts
      perf_counts__reset

jirka


  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-07 15:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-07  6:58 [PATCH v3 0/4] perf stat: Support overall statistics for interval mode Jin Yao
2020-05-07  6:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] perf stat: Fix wrong per-thread runtime stat " Jin Yao
2020-05-07 15:19   ` Jiri Olsa
2020-05-08  2:03     ` Jin, Yao
2020-05-07  6:58 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] perf counts: Reset prev_raw_counts counts Jin Yao
2020-05-07 15:19   ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2020-05-08  2:45     ` Jin, Yao
2020-05-07  6:58 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] perf stat: Copy counts from prev_raw_counts to evsel->counts Jin Yao
2020-05-07 15:19   ` Jiri Olsa
2020-05-08  3:34     ` Jin, Yao
2020-05-07  6:58 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] perf stat: Report summary for interval mode Jin Yao
2020-05-07 15:18   ` Jiri Olsa
2020-05-08  1:11     ` Jin, Yao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200507151932.GF2804092@krava \
    --to=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=yao.jin@intel.com \
    --cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.