All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ye Xiaolong <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
To: Phil Yang <Phil.Yang@arm.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"konstantin.ananyev@intel.com" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	"wenzhuo.lu@intel.com" <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
	"qi.z.zhang@intel.com" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
	Lijian Zhang <Lijian.Zhang@arm.com>, Gavin Hu <Gavin.Hu@arm.com>,
	Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	nd <nd@arm.com>, "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: fix link state timing issue on fiber	ports
Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 16:36:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200508083607.GE75514@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VE1PR08MB46409E07980A5955D90F4109E9A20@VE1PR08MB4640.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>

On 05/08, Phil Yang wrote:
>> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: fix link state timing issue on fiber
>> ports
>> 
>> With some models of fiber ports (e.g. X520-2 device ID 0x10fb), it
>> is possible when a port is started to experience a timing issue
>> which prevents the link from ever being fully set up.
>> 
>> In ixgbe_dev_link_update_share(), if the media type is fiber and the
>> link is down, a flag (IXGBE_FLAG_NEED_LINK_CONFIG) is set. A callback
>> to ixgbe_dev_setup_link_thread_handler() is scheduled which should
>> try to set up the link and clear the flag afterwards.
>> 
>> If the device is started before the flag is cleared, the scheduled
>> callback is cancelled. This causes the flag to remain set and
>> subsequent calls to ixgbe_dev_link_update_share() return
>> without trying to retrieve the link state because the flag is set.
>> 
>> In ixgbe_dev_cancel_link_thread(), after cancelling the callback,
>> unset the flag on the device to avoid this condition.
>> 
>> Fixes: 819d0d1d57f1 ("net/ixgbe: fix blocking system events")
>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>> 
>> Bugzilla ID: 388
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Phil Yang <phil.yang@arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Lijian Zhang <lijian.zhang@arm.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
>> ---
>
>Ping.

This fix makes sense to me, thanks for the work.
And it seems can't be applied to latest dpdk-next-net-intel cleanly, could you
do a rebase?

Thanks,
Xiaolong

>
>Thanks,
>Phil
>
><Snip>

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-08  8:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-19  6:41 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/ixgbe: fix link state timing issue on fiber ports Phil Yang
2020-03-19 10:51 ` Lijian Zhang
2020-05-08  2:48 ` Phil Yang
2020-05-08  8:36   ` Ye Xiaolong [this message]
2020-05-08 10:31     ` Phil Yang
2020-05-08 10:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Phil Yang
2020-05-11  2:49   ` Ye Xiaolong

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200508083607.GE75514@intel.com \
    --to=xiaolong.ye@intel.com \
    --cc=Gavin.Hu@arm.com \
    --cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=Lijian.Zhang@arm.com \
    --cc=Phil.Yang@arm.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.