From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Snitzer Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/14] dm-zoned: add 'status' and 'message' callbacks Date: Fri, 8 May 2020 12:29:56 -0400 Message-ID: <20200508162955.GA18662@redhat.com> References: <20200508090332.40716-1-hare@suse.de> <20200508090332.40716-2-hare@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20200508090332.40716-2-hare@suse.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Content-Disposition: inline To: Hannes Reinecke Cc: Damien LeMoal , Bob Liu , dm-devel@redhat.com List-Id: dm-devel.ids On Fri, May 08 2020 at 5:03am -0400, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > Add callbacks to supply information for 'dmsetup status' > and 'dmsetup info', and implement the message 'reclaim' > to start the reclaim worker. Same feedback from before: https://www.redhat.com/archives/dm-devel/2020-March/msg00189.html Who/What will use the 'reclaim' message? Shouldn't it be documented? Think the dmz_status changes should be split out from this reclaim message? Thanks, Mike