From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, bp@alien8.de,
luto@kernel.org
Cc: hpa@zytor.com, dave.hansen@intel.com, tony.luck@intel.com,
ak@linux.intel.com, ravi.v.shankar@intel.com,
chang.seok.bae@intel.com, Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v12 12/18] x86/fsgsbase/64: move save_fsgs to header file
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 00:53:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200511045311.4785-13-sashal@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200511045311.4785-1-sashal@kernel.org>
Given copy_thread_tls() is now shared between 32 and 64 bit and we need
to use save_fsgs() there, move it to a header file.
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/process.h | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 68 ----------------------------------
2 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.h b/arch/x86/kernel/process.h
index 1d0797b2338a2..2360d340cbf00 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.h
@@ -37,3 +37,75 @@ static inline void switch_to_extra(struct task_struct *prev,
prev_tif & _TIF_WORK_CTXSW_PREV))
__switch_to_xtra(prev, next);
}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+
+enum which_selector {
+ FS,
+ GS
+};
+
+/*
+ * Saves the FS or GS base for an outgoing thread if FSGSBASE extensions are
+ * not available. The goal is to be reasonably fast on non-FSGSBASE systems.
+ * It's forcibly inlined because it'll generate better code and this function
+ * is hot.
+ */
+static __always_inline void save_base_legacy(struct task_struct *prev_p,
+ unsigned short selector,
+ enum which_selector which)
+{
+ if (likely(selector == 0)) {
+ /*
+ * On Intel (without X86_BUG_NULL_SEG), the segment base could
+ * be the pre-existing saved base or it could be zero. On AMD
+ * (with X86_BUG_NULL_SEG), the segment base could be almost
+ * anything.
+ *
+ * This branch is very hot (it's hit twice on almost every
+ * context switch between 64-bit programs), and avoiding
+ * the RDMSR helps a lot, so we just assume that whatever
+ * value is already saved is correct. This matches historical
+ * Linux behavior, so it won't break existing applications.
+ *
+ * To avoid leaking state, on non-X86_BUG_NULL_SEG CPUs, if we
+ * report that the base is zero, it needs to actually be zero:
+ * see the corresponding logic in load_seg_legacy.
+ */
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * If the selector is 1, 2, or 3, then the base is zero on
+ * !X86_BUG_NULL_SEG CPUs and could be anything on
+ * X86_BUG_NULL_SEG CPUs. In the latter case, Linux
+ * has never attempted to preserve the base across context
+ * switches.
+ *
+ * If selector > 3, then it refers to a real segment, and
+ * saving the base isn't necessary.
+ */
+ if (which == FS)
+ prev_p->thread.fsbase = 0;
+ else
+ prev_p->thread.gsbase = 0;
+ }
+}
+
+static __always_inline void save_fsgs(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+ savesegment(fs, task->thread.fsindex);
+ savesegment(gs, task->thread.gsindex);
+ if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_FSGSBASE)) {
+ /*
+ * If FSGSBASE is enabled, we can't make any useful guesses
+ * about the base, and user code expects us to save the current
+ * value. Fortunately, reading the base directly is efficient.
+ */
+ task->thread.fsbase = rdfsbase();
+ task->thread.gsbase = x86_gsbase_read_cpu_inactive();
+ } else {
+ save_base_legacy(task, task->thread.fsindex, FS);
+ save_base_legacy(task, task->thread.gsindex, GS);
+ }
+}
+
+#endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
index e066750be89a0..4be88124d81ea 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
@@ -145,74 +145,6 @@ void release_thread(struct task_struct *dead_task)
WARN_ON(dead_task->mm);
}
-enum which_selector {
- FS,
- GS
-};
-
-/*
- * Saves the FS or GS base for an outgoing thread if FSGSBASE extensions are
- * not available. The goal is to be reasonably fast on non-FSGSBASE systems.
- * It's forcibly inlined because it'll generate better code and this function
- * is hot.
- */
-static __always_inline void save_base_legacy(struct task_struct *prev_p,
- unsigned short selector,
- enum which_selector which)
-{
- if (likely(selector == 0)) {
- /*
- * On Intel (without X86_BUG_NULL_SEG), the segment base could
- * be the pre-existing saved base or it could be zero. On AMD
- * (with X86_BUG_NULL_SEG), the segment base could be almost
- * anything.
- *
- * This branch is very hot (it's hit twice on almost every
- * context switch between 64-bit programs), and avoiding
- * the RDMSR helps a lot, so we just assume that whatever
- * value is already saved is correct. This matches historical
- * Linux behavior, so it won't break existing applications.
- *
- * To avoid leaking state, on non-X86_BUG_NULL_SEG CPUs, if we
- * report that the base is zero, it needs to actually be zero:
- * see the corresponding logic in load_seg_legacy.
- */
- } else {
- /*
- * If the selector is 1, 2, or 3, then the base is zero on
- * !X86_BUG_NULL_SEG CPUs and could be anything on
- * X86_BUG_NULL_SEG CPUs. In the latter case, Linux
- * has never attempted to preserve the base across context
- * switches.
- *
- * If selector > 3, then it refers to a real segment, and
- * saving the base isn't necessary.
- */
- if (which == FS)
- prev_p->thread.fsbase = 0;
- else
- prev_p->thread.gsbase = 0;
- }
-}
-
-static __always_inline void save_fsgs(struct task_struct *task)
-{
- savesegment(fs, task->thread.fsindex);
- savesegment(gs, task->thread.gsindex);
- if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_FSGSBASE)) {
- /*
- * If FSGSBASE is enabled, we can't make any useful guesses
- * about the base, and user code expects us to save the current
- * value. Fortunately, reading the base directly is efficient.
- */
- task->thread.fsbase = rdfsbase();
- task->thread.gsbase = x86_gsbase_read_cpu_inactive();
- } else {
- save_base_legacy(task, task->thread.fsindex, FS);
- save_base_legacy(task, task->thread.gsindex, GS);
- }
-}
-
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM)
/*
* While a process is running,current->thread.fsbase and current->thread.gsbase
--
2.20.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-11 4:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-11 4:52 [PATCH v12 00/18] Enable FSGSBASE instructions Sasha Levin
2020-05-11 4:52 ` [PATCH v12 01/18] x86/ptrace: Prevent ptrace from clearing the FS/GS selector Sasha Levin
2020-05-11 4:52 ` [PATCH v12 02/18] selftests/x86/fsgsbase: Test GS selector on ptracer-induced GS base write Sasha Levin
2020-05-11 4:52 ` [PATCH v12 03/18] x86/cpu: Add 'unsafe_fsgsbase' to enable CR4.FSGSBASE Sasha Levin
2020-05-11 4:52 ` [PATCH v12 04/18] x86/entry/64: Clean up paranoid exit Sasha Levin
2020-05-11 4:52 ` [PATCH v12 05/18] x86/entry/64: Switch CR3 before SWAPGS in paranoid entry Sasha Levin
2020-05-11 4:52 ` [PATCH v12 06/18] x86/entry/64: Introduce the FIND_PERCPU_BASE macro Sasha Levin
2020-05-11 4:53 ` [PATCH v12 07/18] x86/entry/64: Handle FSGSBASE enabled paranoid entry/exit Sasha Levin
2020-05-11 4:53 ` [PATCH v12 08/18] x86/entry/64: Document GSBASE handling in the paranoid path Sasha Levin
2020-05-11 4:53 ` [PATCH v12 09/18] x86/fsgsbase/64: Add intrinsics for FSGSBASE instructions Sasha Levin
2020-05-11 4:53 ` [PATCH v12 10/18] x86/fsgsbase/64: Enable FSGSBASE instructions in helper functions Sasha Levin
2020-05-18 18:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-18 20:24 ` Sasha Levin
2020-05-18 22:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-19 12:20 ` David Laight
2020-05-19 14:48 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-20 9:13 ` David Laight
2020-05-11 4:53 ` [PATCH v12 11/18] x86/fsgsbase/64: Use FSGSBASE in switch_to() if available Sasha Levin
2020-05-11 4:53 ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2020-05-11 4:53 ` [PATCH v12 13/18] x86/fsgsbase/64: Use FSGSBASE instructions on thread copy and ptrace Sasha Levin
2020-05-11 4:53 ` [PATCH v12 14/18] x86/speculation/swapgs: Check FSGSBASE in enabling SWAPGS mitigation Sasha Levin
2020-05-11 4:53 ` [PATCH v12 15/18] selftests/x86/fsgsbase: Test ptracer-induced GS base write with FSGSBASE Sasha Levin
2020-05-11 4:53 ` [PATCH v12 16/18] x86/fsgsbase/64: Enable FSGSBASE on 64bit by default and add a chicken bit Sasha Levin
2020-05-11 4:53 ` [PATCH v12 17/18] x86/elf: Enumerate kernel FSGSBASE capability in AT_HWCAP2 Sasha Levin
2020-05-11 4:53 ` [PATCH v12 18/18] Documentation/x86/64: Add documentation for GS/FS addressing mode Sasha Levin
2020-05-15 9:24 ` [PATCH v12 00/18] Enable FSGSBASE instructions Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-15 16:40 ` Sasha Levin
2020-05-15 17:55 ` Andi Kleen
2020-05-15 23:07 ` Sasha Levin
2020-05-16 12:21 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-16 9:50 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-18 15:34 ` Andi Kleen
2020-05-18 20:01 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-18 23:03 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-19 16:48 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-22 20:14 ` Don Porter
2020-05-22 20:55 ` Dave Hansen
2020-05-23 0:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-24 19:45 ` hpa
2020-05-24 21:19 ` Sasha Levin
2020-05-24 23:44 ` hpa
2020-05-25 7:54 ` Richard Weinberger
2020-05-25 21:56 ` Tony Luck
2020-05-26 8:12 ` David Laight
2020-05-26 8:23 ` Richard Weinberger
2020-05-27 8:31 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-26 12:42 ` Don Porter
2020-05-26 20:27 ` Sasha Levin
2020-05-26 22:03 ` Don Porter
2020-05-26 22:51 ` Sasha Levin
2020-05-28 17:37 ` Don Porter
2020-05-28 10:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-28 17:40 ` Don Porter
2020-05-28 18:38 ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-05-29 15:27 ` Wojtek Porczyk
2020-06-25 15:27 ` Don Porter
2020-06-25 21:37 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-07-18 18:19 ` Don Porter
2020-07-23 3:23 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-28 19:19 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-28 19:41 ` Sasha Levin
2020-05-29 3:07 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-29 3:10 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-25 15:30 ` Don Porter
2020-06-25 21:40 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-23 4:19 ` Andi Kleen
2020-05-28 10:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-27 8:20 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-27 12:42 ` Wojtek Porczyk
2020-05-18 9:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-18 15:16 ` Sasha Levin
2020-05-18 18:28 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-18 19:36 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-18 6:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-18 12:33 ` Sasha Levin
2020-05-18 14:53 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200511045311.4785-13-sashal@kernel.org \
--to=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.