From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6AE1C2D0F8 for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 23:09:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DCA520747 for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 23:09:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1589324998; bh=21shcGboZ/UI67vsNX5V9akXKBR0/nMcHkMB8JizcQ8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=F9TumQonkDO6OQeeL+JvtWHDzBJpn4aqamPJq/i0Mb7XXkkCLqxkEoqvXOYObRkV8 WGOLfa3S5+dOxuq3hv0aEy++qUfezweEbGrnOUkK+UfuNkgVIJziU7eDDl2aD35gLg Ci+gtI7MgZcbiOHPlTKI8+8BIiM31APJ+v38Jv9E= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728220AbgELXJ6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2020 19:09:58 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-f195.google.com ([209.85.167.195]:40806 "EHLO mail-oi1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725938AbgELXJ6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2020 19:09:58 -0400 Received: by mail-oi1-f195.google.com with SMTP id v128so2972117oia.7; Tue, 12 May 2020 16:09:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=TjYd3leSKKn51ZfY7qRcr7llrPytDm0GdCIEZD2j8C0=; b=YOcW1N/aZdkNavfBhDLaPPKkCJpdD0SC0EMMo/CW1nENoZkg5aEIo6bYvKbmffD4X1 CpySzjC7Hel/chlTNGwzBwd7jlrviOHs7IsRRZO05yzYV5/la3SjrgUdraxs2srAo0JN k+fvGe+iAMogHhPoKpduAbzlJVIYQdSLVCbNf683JQIUWbE9bexnLH4MAn2E05/CUW5Z WvJ/umlU21AIS6KAs4eT3QmxF8ZZgsatauhezwgjsy1wlsKSQey3AtK7KYSIs40HEJP+ lkl0WK8ajuJ6QWWvGUjAxrsWCd2OY/kzjyTDj/YfbbsCBKdjhLxQLjeM/JPSw/QRdS8u v5CQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZAWZFjJXhhxZ3Q5uBdtblrrex3FIgWhfSO8TgzGargqS/EtK9X JamKUDjbk+VJpRBS8NVx560jTW2OnA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIp6z6XpDyeSpU/MQIh4PPKcXp8UTWOTpvjD0Pwk05Fb3joF3Y1t4vigT4+SMH68vOz8q6/qQ== X-Received: by 2002:aca:c68b:: with SMTP id w133mr23020989oif.27.1589324996924; Tue, 12 May 2020 16:09:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rob-hp-laptop (24-155-109-49.dyn.grandenetworks.net. [24.155.109.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 34sm385316otq.67.2020.05.12.16.09.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 12 May 2020 16:09:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: (nullmailer pid 16218 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 12 May 2020 23:09:54 -0000 Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 18:09:54 -0500 From: Rob Herring To: Prakhar Srivastava Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, frowand.list@gmail.com, zohar@linux.ibm.com, dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, allison@lohutok.net, kstewart@linuxfoundation.org, takahiro.akashi@linaro.org, tglx@linutronix.de, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, masahiroy@kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com, bhsharma@redhat.com, mbrugger@suse.com, hsinyi@chromium.org, tao.li@vivo.com, christophe.leroy@c-s.fr, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, nramas@linux.microsoft.com, tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com, balajib@linux.microsoft.com Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Add a layer of abstraction to use the memory reserved by device tree for ima buffer pass. Message-ID: <20200512230954.GB2654@bogus> References: <20200504203829.6330-1-prsriva@linux.microsoft.com> <20200504203829.6330-2-prsriva@linux.microsoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200504203829.6330-2-prsriva@linux.microsoft.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-integrity-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 01:38:28PM -0700, Prakhar Srivastava wrote: > Introduce a device tree layer for to read and store ima buffer > from the reserved memory section of a device tree. But why do I need 'a layer of abstraction'? I don't like them. > Signed-off-by: Prakhar Srivastava > --- > drivers/of/Kconfig | 6 ++ > drivers/of/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/of/of_ima.c | 165 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Who are the users of this code and why does it need to be here? Most code for specific bindings are not in drivers/of/ but with the user. It doesn't sound like there's more than 1 user. > include/linux/of.h | 34 +++++++++ > 4 files changed, 206 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drivers/of/of_ima.c From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B86EC2D0F8 for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 23:12:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B981220740 for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 23:12:07 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B981220740 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49MD8d3GryzDqnV for ; Wed, 13 May 2020 09:12:01 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com (client-ip=209.85.167.195; helo=mail-oi1-f195.google.com; envelope-from=robherring2@gmail.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Received: from mail-oi1-f195.google.com (mail-oi1-f195.google.com [209.85.167.195]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49MD6H4MTCzDqLF for ; Wed, 13 May 2020 09:09:59 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-oi1-f195.google.com with SMTP id x7so18893060oic.3 for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 16:09:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=TjYd3leSKKn51ZfY7qRcr7llrPytDm0GdCIEZD2j8C0=; b=JZJWmMd4nx6PA8uaOyVTEhgyXXV1C8JsQIYVKRjuOzF+KlDGfiEKBTzCt3ISW42kqE sKODv+Mw0MIXB6h+Tu7yGLZ3PeP9rEnG5FKhMSALYR1xLHiSjDEKGRnbjPxghl4lZ/SM 9JLhsW0dTq7+v8DM6hGuuUhRgJ/RTgk/84R3vBxAgHlq/G8RHDS1iihRyhvATgcTGEDm 1yNgPkCLFk5ckZ/KomE7LBV/BvNQ1w/vyk2/Lhy6e1UOtGZNODF+8P5z6KwYvLOFLpHM c1gICRY6z82QQFsnuxQi/DsCxiSZhcNRejWBnw+JhaDa1KpvSECz+3dn+ICniG6oaikS AIaA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0Pub78EOh+KjvHEDIJKtEXl58yiaGgHphU+8w1ruMo/4GllTadIxC rKVveJW55VKIW5ZkWhn+Qg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIp6z6XpDyeSpU/MQIh4PPKcXp8UTWOTpvjD0Pwk05Fb3joF3Y1t4vigT4+SMH68vOz8q6/qQ== X-Received: by 2002:aca:c68b:: with SMTP id w133mr23020989oif.27.1589324996924; Tue, 12 May 2020 16:09:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rob-hp-laptop (24-155-109-49.dyn.grandenetworks.net. [24.155.109.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 34sm385316otq.67.2020.05.12.16.09.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 12 May 2020 16:09:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: (nullmailer pid 16218 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 12 May 2020 23:09:54 -0000 Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 18:09:54 -0500 From: Rob Herring To: Prakhar Srivastava Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Add a layer of abstraction to use the memory reserved by device tree for ima buffer pass. Message-ID: <20200512230954.GB2654@bogus> References: <20200504203829.6330-1-prsriva@linux.microsoft.com> <20200504203829.6330-2-prsriva@linux.microsoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200504203829.6330-2-prsriva@linux.microsoft.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kstewart@linuxfoundation.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, bhsharma@redhat.com, tao.li@vivo.com, zohar@linux.ibm.com, paulus@samba.org, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, will@kernel.org, nramas@linux.microsoft.com, frowand.list@gmail.com, masahiroy@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org, takahiro.akashi@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, serge@hallyn.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, hsinyi@chromium.org, tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com, tglx@linutronix.de, allison@lohutok.net, mbrugger@suse.com, balajib@linux.microsoft.com, dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 01:38:28PM -0700, Prakhar Srivastava wrote: > Introduce a device tree layer for to read and store ima buffer > from the reserved memory section of a device tree. But why do I need 'a layer of abstraction'? I don't like them. > Signed-off-by: Prakhar Srivastava > --- > drivers/of/Kconfig | 6 ++ > drivers/of/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/of/of_ima.c | 165 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Who are the users of this code and why does it need to be here? Most code for specific bindings are not in drivers/of/ but with the user. It doesn't sound like there's more than 1 user. > include/linux/of.h | 34 +++++++++ > 4 files changed, 206 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drivers/of/of_ima.c From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C907C2D0FB for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 23:10:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E65E220740 for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 23:10:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="sUGkOvJW" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org E65E220740 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=0t4SrEXvsWpSoNXGxhxtquXhdSGQk2tAzwedywW0UFY=; b=sUGkOvJWlRSW6S TkWU3qsMeMb1k5hmMf24EdoBFz+yj5TMf0x/oeMea8dmYobGOhL9L0bA5pstRWRZlM8mNlqLVg+Mc b+YMJfIyUselk8/ywzcUPeKiC5zxrEEdR+x+Bdjdi+TkkKKZVwQQfLRknDWP2dekYu5oQt/r0nUiy wO59J4D/ZYLJk0h1vtV/QepQja3/cA2nYMQm761U7DG9er5m/1GfEtxBoucDKipV8F1xomeFu1Sin fs6F5PbmgW5nLCaST9cM9F1eCYlaYIbZnisndzfBo/NHYEquim7p7H/E9OssxAxDKyJ39c3DbKqJ4 Td/su5dOrQUxPfV+N4vg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jYe2D-0000KI-Gn; Tue, 12 May 2020 23:10:01 +0000 Received: from mail-oi1-f194.google.com ([209.85.167.194]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jYe2A-0000Je-99 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 12 May 2020 23:09:59 +0000 Received: by mail-oi1-f194.google.com with SMTP id 19so19792025oiy.8 for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 16:09:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=TjYd3leSKKn51ZfY7qRcr7llrPytDm0GdCIEZD2j8C0=; b=H7T8CK/cWDvmNg/AqRsfn+KpLtLlFl//6YGOmq92+ujdSiXZAjr33nTHqY+bIvDN5o g61JUi+6KmMlbJKI1nUmhgYuGsBLn08GqUwJgDbjy+cA5QPA79Cd+5/2LAJqxl0IX1YA tTEadlN2YLFszQWi9/ObCNMBhGjVw/yQqT50hK6qXMcesvyeMFL7dugRFXzgVUWwdNXn 29JVDQfLwYJUxCI6+Y5NQhdLwbIben+TIorSVi6A/tJi7qtAGTWzb6j8MRqd8GVHR554 bcB6O/gYBNzH+bPJbLJkUp0Ay/XygSpKVMxr3UZzqrnsYx1iP0t09zTvbXh8QBn1Yt7+ D2jg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZJj77p5/T6j0XlnkQYUBxeHBeSgZdU61o+BCKzEO1+7uM/37TW QXvB8tEoKbP/f+XoWyGFew== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIp6z6XpDyeSpU/MQIh4PPKcXp8UTWOTpvjD0Pwk05Fb3joF3Y1t4vigT4+SMH68vOz8q6/qQ== X-Received: by 2002:aca:c68b:: with SMTP id w133mr23020989oif.27.1589324996924; Tue, 12 May 2020 16:09:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rob-hp-laptop (24-155-109-49.dyn.grandenetworks.net. [24.155.109.49]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 34sm385316otq.67.2020.05.12.16.09.54 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 12 May 2020 16:09:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: (nullmailer pid 16218 invoked by uid 1000); Tue, 12 May 2020 23:09:54 -0000 Date: Tue, 12 May 2020 18:09:54 -0500 From: Rob Herring To: Prakhar Srivastava Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Add a layer of abstraction to use the memory reserved by device tree for ima buffer pass. Message-ID: <20200512230954.GB2654@bogus> References: <20200504203829.6330-1-prsriva@linux.microsoft.com> <20200504203829.6330-2-prsriva@linux.microsoft.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200504203829.6330-2-prsriva@linux.microsoft.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200512_160958_319451_451AC471 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.08 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: kstewart@linuxfoundation.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, bhsharma@redhat.com, tao.li@vivo.com, zohar@linux.ibm.com, paulus@samba.org, vincenzo.frascino@arm.com, will@kernel.org, nramas@linux.microsoft.com, frowand.list@gmail.com, masahiroy@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org, takahiro.akashi@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, serge@hallyn.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, pasha.tatashin@soleen.com, hsinyi@chromium.org, tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com, tglx@linutronix.de, allison@lohutok.net, christophe.leroy@c-s.fr, mbrugger@suse.com, balajib@linux.microsoft.com, dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, james.morse@arm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 01:38:28PM -0700, Prakhar Srivastava wrote: > Introduce a device tree layer for to read and store ima buffer > from the reserved memory section of a device tree. But why do I need 'a layer of abstraction'? I don't like them. > Signed-off-by: Prakhar Srivastava > --- > drivers/of/Kconfig | 6 ++ > drivers/of/Makefile | 1 + > drivers/of/of_ima.c | 165 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Who are the users of this code and why does it need to be here? Most code for specific bindings are not in drivers/of/ but with the user. It doesn't sound like there's more than 1 user. > include/linux/of.h | 34 +++++++++ > 4 files changed, 206 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 drivers/of/of_ima.c _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel