From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.stusta.mhn.de (mail.stusta.mhn.de [141.84.69.5]) by mx.groups.io with SMTP id smtpd.web11.161.1589480368693264071 for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 11:19:30 -0700 Authentication-Results: mx.groups.io; dkim=pass header.i=@stusta.de header.s=default header.b=FRW9SDZm; spf=pass (domain: stusta.mhn.de, ip: 141.84.69.5, mailfrom: srs0=glre=64=stusta.de=bunk@stusta.mhn.de) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.stusta.mhn.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49NKYy6FrZzP7; Thu, 14 May 2020 20:19:18 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=stusta.de; s=default; t=1589480359; bh=+Fg/435N0y873ZagBObt0EK4ih7jxiq9/yFAcTTTzBM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=FRW9SDZm+Dt86GjpBFExmBwrX7jMmrcsspXTXwkeugbMgXKP/8T41UUUrhfMHN0FO kGzD2PmCUME+8cRR7wxDDpWwHdAGfqA3ti1YSdcauirYsmykbcZmVLuEDMtGOkzzfF 4Rx9R6Ont/ma7ZMDaUqiDONgyOUlEIvLpBGEe2oArCylJeQhHG1asba1CJnYXk1P1B cnd6L9/y0i74snzjQegfjS0K+LR3hs8fNqqlKHM3HfOaoqQ/7MM6nDo2aXaK7vHwXB q99jX7/k4bKXVJHzYoDiqGPfAR7gKu1ZMxw/fwYNVmkIihGPRKFzvxi79kZfLci34D mQT2Ig56/3Lfi3fUbsNcfTE87N0xFVxn3iKT9E0ERpWuNmFMloDPVjcgArcS3uMDEB bjpn/9J1aUF9Zu2wG3JEcOuvnjK81pXY7gkU3xjQojCkLx8hir5IzULI3U/R7+ebTZ SRjNPSnKpZZsy7Nhst2DK3yE7fLkdgtADcburxITRAbyaTbe1/Miy38fBPtwczamb8 ix1k3bywo9MbPbQwj82xsbAEgAbbfND+Tyj7oQCQR6OqAZfWlm7wHYrPWJ/0rZjLdE 6wHg8fDwJShfYsj4My1j7ol9KxaiAYCNvJbhmKhSgvyv6mYVcD9qsjIHfi/9UiniQ5 u6Wdu7DLIlEupXIXIrgKLsaY= Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 21:19:17 +0300 From: "Adrian Bunk" To: Khem Raj Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [OE-core] [PATCH V3 3/3] gcc10: Revert using __getauxval in libgcc Message-ID: <20200514181917.GA28774@localhost> References: <20200511182812.441561-1-raj.khem@gmail.com> <20200511182812.441561-3-raj.khem@gmail.com> <20200514152934.GC21399@localhost> <7111a5b8-12b5-d683-eb39-6661223697ad@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <7111a5b8-12b5-d683-eb39-6661223697ad@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 10:18:53AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On 5/14/20 8:29 AM, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > Disabling -moutline-atomics would also workaround this issue. > > I think this is a good suggestion and I do not like to revert gcc patches if > we can avoid doing that. I will propose a fix to disable outline-atomics for > valgrind on aarch64 >... Not just for valgrind, globally. The main effect in Yocto distributions is (slightly) slower and larger code. cu Adrian