From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC943C433E1 for ; Sun, 17 May 2020 08:55:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A49ED207EA for ; Sun, 17 May 2020 08:55:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727021AbgEQIzo (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 May 2020 04:55:44 -0400 Received: from elvis.franken.de ([193.175.24.41]:56338 "EHLO elvis.franken.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727050AbgEQIzo (ORCPT ); Sun, 17 May 2020 04:55:44 -0400 Received: from uucp (helo=alpha) by elvis.franken.de with local-bsmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1jaF5B-0003F8-02; Sun, 17 May 2020 10:55:41 +0200 Received: by alpha.franken.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AF64FC04D6; Sun, 17 May 2020 10:38:47 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 17 May 2020 10:38:47 +0200 From: Thomas Bogendoerfer To: WANG Xuerui Cc: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] CPUCFG emulation on older Loongson64 cores Message-ID: <20200517083847.GC3939@alpha.franken.de> References: <20200502133846.40590-1-git@xen0n.name> <20200503103304.40678-1-git@xen0n.name> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-mips-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-mips@vger.kernel.org On Sat, May 16, 2020 at 07:29:39PM +0800, WANG Xuerui wrote: > On 5/3/20 6:33 PM, WANG Xuerui wrote: > What is the status of this series? I know that I borked the threading of > replies, I can resend if it's the only thing holding the series. > > And I think the patch may well need to be reorganized, but no replies yet. > I'm not a professional kernel developer, and any review is appreciated! I've applied patch 1-3 to mips-next. Patch 4 needs more work... Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]